Follow:
- Next story S.13B HMA | 6-Month Cooling Off Period Not Mandatory: Gujarat HC Quashes Order Rejecting Plea For Divorce By Mutual Consent
- Previous story [05/01, 10:50] Sekarreporter: #SupremeCourt sets aside dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya who was removed while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge on allegations of corruption and adopting double standard while deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. [05/01, 10:50] Meta AI: The Supreme Court has set aside the dismissal of Madhya Pradesh judicial officer Nirbhay Singh Suliya, who was removed from service while serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge. Suliya was accused of corruption and adopting double standards in deciding bail applications under the Excise Act. The Madhya Pradesh High Court had upheld his removal, citing his failure to maintain high standards of judicial conduct. ¹ ² ³ The allegations against Suliya included granting bail to some applicants while dismissing similar applications, ignoring provisions of Section 59-A of the M.P. Excise Act. However, the Supreme Court’s decision suggests a review of the case, potentially considering factors like lack of direct evidence for corrupt motives or procedural improprieties in the disciplinary proceedings. Would you like to know more about the implications of this ruling or the specific grounds on which the Supreme Court based its decision?
Recent Posts
- Ndps bail granted THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8733 of 2026 Krishna @ Varun S/o Rajagopal, No.29A, Veerapan Nayakar Street, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner
More
Recent Posts
- Ndps bail granted THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8733 of 2026 Krishna @ Varun S/o Rajagopal, No.29A, Veerapan Nayakar Street, Arupukottai, Virudhunagar. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.No.44029 of 2025and W.M.P.No.49135 of 2025 The Public Information Officer / The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai – 600 104. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.S.Srikumar .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER https://www.sekarreporter.com/07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-http-youtube-com-post-ugkxq5touhmcekt-7tztrzbvz_xugehwk0hcsif0hzvjp9wt1bt5jw-07-06-1328-sekarreporter1-bail-was-sough-against-the/
- 07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ5TouHMceKT-7TztrzBVz_xUGEhwK0Hc?si=F0HzVjp9Wt1bt5jW [07/06, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Bail was sough against the NDPS offences, the petitioner was in possession of substances scheduled under the commercial quantity, the main grounds for consideration was the non issuance of grounds of arrest as mandated under the SECTION 47&48 of the BNSS and the Article 22(1) of the constitution of India in the light of the supreme court’s decisions. [07/06, 13:30] sekarreporter1: PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in FIR.No.08 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Nirmal Aditya For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 2301 of 2024 AND WMP NO. 2588 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2587 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2912 OF 2024,WP NO. 2646 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2910 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2911 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2393 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2396 OF 2024,WP NO. 2380 OF 2024,WP NO. 2382 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2491 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2259 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2260 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2261 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2492 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2584 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2582 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2258 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2585 OF 2024,WMP NO. 2586 OF 2024,WP NO. 2109 OF 2024,WP NO. 2110 OF 2024,WP NO. 2205 OF 2024 1. All Omni Bus Owners Association Rep.By Its President Dr.A.Anbazhagan, F-4.Sriji Majestic Complex Omni Bus Terminal, No.6, E- Road, Chennai- 102. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Transport Commissioner