You may also like...
Follow:
- Next story 27.In fine, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order dated 10.07.2024 in I.A.No.03 of 2023 in O.S.No.2422 of 2021 on the file of the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 22.08.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes/No ata To The XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. P.B.BALAJI. J, ata Pre-delivery order made in CRP.No.1957 of 2025 & CMP.No.11192 of 2025 22.08.2025
- Previous story [04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: BREAKING Justices G Jayachandran & KK Ramakrishnan of #MadrasHighCourt Madurai Bench uphold Justice GR Swaminathan’s order regarding lighting of Karthigai Deepam lamp on a Deepathoon atop the Tirupparakundram hill in Madurai. Dismiss State appeal [04/12, 16:13] Sekarreporter: Division Bench says there was nothing wrong on the part of the single judge in having directed CISF to accompany the petitioner for lighting the lamp on the Deepathoon. It also says Govt officials had filed the present appeal only to escape punishment in contempt proceedings.
Recent Posts
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate
- [02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor
- Hon’ble Court observed that the writ petition had been taken up at a very late stage, when the Special TNTET examination was scheduled to be conducted within a short time. In view of the imminent examination, the Court indicated that the present examination may proceed in accordance with the existing notification and that the petitioners should participate in the examination under the present scheme.
- உச்ச நீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர் திரு. கே. ராஜன் என்பவர் தமிழக அரசுக்குக் கோரிக்கை மனு சமர்ப்பித்துள்ளார். அதில் கூறிய சாராம்சம் என்னவென்றால், தமிழகத்தில் உள்ள ஏரிகளை நம்பி விவசாயிகள் தங்களுடைய விவசாய நிலத்தில் பயிரிட்டு வருகிறார்கள். ஆனால் கடந்த ஆட்சியில் தமிழகத்தில்
- 1.2 crore people have watched Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay starrer #JanaNayagan after the movie got leaked online even before it could be certified for public exhibition by the Central Board of Film Certification, Chennai police informs #MadrasHighCourt Justice C
More
Recent Posts
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate
- [02/07, 17:24] sekarreporter1: Madras HC Holds Civil Dispute Over Wharfage Refund Cannot Be Tried As Criminal Offence, Quashes CBI Case https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344 [02/07, 17:25] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioner: Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, Mr.R. Rajarathinam, Sc for Mr.S. Arunachalam For Respondent: Mr. K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor” https://www.livelawbiz.com/customs/high-court/wharfage-refund-dispute-cannot-be-given-criminal-colour-539344#:~:text=For%20Petitioner%3A,Special%20Public%20Prosecutor
- Hon’ble Court observed that the writ petition had been taken up at a very late stage, when the Special TNTET examination was scheduled to be conducted within a short time. In view of the imminent examination, the Court indicated that the present examination may proceed in accordance with the existing notification and that the petitioners should participate in the examination under the present scheme.
- உச்ச நீதிமன்ற வழக்கறிஞர் திரு. கே. ராஜன் என்பவர் தமிழக அரசுக்குக் கோரிக்கை மனு சமர்ப்பித்துள்ளார். அதில் கூறிய சாராம்சம் என்னவென்றால், தமிழகத்தில் உள்ள ஏரிகளை நம்பி விவசாயிகள் தங்களுடைய விவசாய நிலத்தில் பயிரிட்டு வருகிறார்கள். ஆனால் கடந்த ஆட்சியில் தமிழகத்தில்
- 1.2 crore people have watched Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay starrer #JanaNayagan after the movie got leaked online even before it could be certified for public exhibition by the Central Board of Film Certification, Chennai police informs #MadrasHighCourt Justice C
