[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: “The High Court of Madras, through its judgment dated 17.10.2025 in M/s Viterra B.V. v. M/s SKT Textile Mills1, held that a party which deliberately chooses not to participate in the arbitral proceedings cannot use its own default as a ground to resist enforcement under Section 48(1)(b) of the A&C Act and upheld the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award rendered under the International Cotton Association, Liverpool (“ICA”),” https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1708896/high-court-of-madras-held-that-deliberate-nonparticipation-cannot-defeat-the-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-award#:~:text=The%20High%20Court%20of,Cotton%20Association%2C%20Liverpool%20(%22ICA%22)%2C [24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: .
[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: “The High Court of Madras, through its judgment dated 17.10.2025 in M/s Viterra B.V. v. M/s SKT Textile Mills1, held that a party which deliberately chooses not to participate in the arbitral proceedings cannot use its own default as a ground to resist enforcement under Section 48(1)(b) of the A&C Act and upheld the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award rendered under the International Cotton Association, Liverpool (“ICA”),”
https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1708896/high-court-of-madras-held-that-deliberate-nonparticipation-cannot-defeat-the-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-award#:~:text=The%20High%20Court%20of,Cotton%20Association%2C%20Liverpool%20(%22ICA%22)%2C
[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: .
