Follow:
- Next story Appoint 621 Sub Inspectors of Police & 129 Fire Station Officers as per the recommendations of rtd Chief Justice N Paul Vasanthakumar, order Justices R Suresh Kumar & Hemant Chandangoudar of #MadrasHighCourt Dismiss an appeal filed by TNUSRB @THChennai
- Previous story Mp Suda பரபரப்பு பேட்டி வீடியோ
Recent Posts
- Justice P Velmurugan and Justice K Govindarajan Thilakavadi observed, “While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs
- The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In the digital age, blocking a URL may silence a speaker, erase a viewpoint and impoverish public debate. Therefore, such power must be exercised with precision, restraint and reasons,” the court added.
- https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/high-court-registrar-general-cannot-suo-motu-initiate-disciplinary-action-against-judicial-officer-supreme-court-534611 [19/05, 08:32] Meta AI: That LiveLaw article covers a *Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 18, 2026*, clarifying who can start disciplinary action against judicial officers.
- This SekarReporter post is a *Madras High Court order dated 14-05-2026* in a _habeas corpus/criminal writ petition_. ### *Case details: WP(Crl) No. 1171 of 2026* *Bench*: The Hon’ble Mrs Justice L. Victoria Gowri _and_ The Hon’ble Mr Justice N. Senthilkumar
- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.05.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WP Crl. No. 1171 of 2026 Kalaiarasi W/o Kamalakannan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai Collectorate, Chengam Road, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison – Vellore, Vellore – 632 002.
More
Recent Posts
- Justice P Velmurugan and Justice K Govindarajan Thilakavadi observed, “While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs
- The power to block or remove online content is a serious power. It may affect not only the author of the content but also the public’s right to receive information. In the digital age, blocking a URL may silence a speaker, erase a viewpoint and impoverish public debate. Therefore, such power must be exercised with precision, restraint and reasons,” the court added.
- https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/high-court-registrar-general-cannot-suo-motu-initiate-disciplinary-action-against-judicial-officer-supreme-court-534611 [19/05, 08:32] Meta AI: That LiveLaw article covers a *Supreme Court judgment delivered on May 18, 2026*, clarifying who can start disciplinary action against judicial officers.
- This SekarReporter post is a *Madras High Court order dated 14-05-2026* in a _habeas corpus/criminal writ petition_. ### *Case details: WP(Crl) No. 1171 of 2026* *Bench*: The Hon’ble Mrs Justice L. Victoria Gowri _and_ The Hon’ble Mr Justice N. Senthilkumar
- HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.05.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WP Crl. No. 1171 of 2026 Kalaiarasi W/o Kamalakannan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai Collectorate, Chengam Road, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison – Vellore, Vellore – 632 002.