You may also like...
-
Vinothpandian: 2025 (6) CTC 372 : lucky footwear components vs authorised officer indian bank : objections raised by borrowers under section 13 ( 3 – A ) SARFASI act should sufficiently amount to objections as contemplated by statute , mere request for extension of time or waiver
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 10, 2026
-
[8/5, 14:07] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1290929933179486214?s=08 [8/5, 14:07] Sekarreporter 1: Look at K Parasaran who fought the aggressive liberal, left and congress lawyers with smile and compassion in the Supreme Court sitting at home and seeing the Bhumi puja in Ayodhya. We should bow our heads to their nonagenarian legal genius who got us the Ram Janmasthaan https://t.co/Pi2DGz8TX0
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 5, 2020
-
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P.No. 18213 of 2022 V.Senthil Balaji S/o.P.Veluchamy, 123, Rameswarapatti, Manmangalam Post, Karur. … Petitioner -V/s- Karthik Dasari, Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ministry of Finance, Through its Deputy Director Chennai –II Zonal Office, Chennai – 600 006 …Respondent AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER I, V.Senthil Balaji, son of Mr.P.Veluchamy, Hindu, aged about 45 years, residing at No.123, Rameswarapatti, Manmangalam Post, Karur
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 1, 2022