Vinothpandian: 2015
[25/08, 09:49] Vinothpandian: 2015 (6) CTC 442 : manikandan vathan chettiar vs madras high court : Any grievance against sitting judge of high court has to be dealt with by bar according to ” in house procedure set by supreme court
[25/08, 09:49] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) CTC 353 : The authorised officer , indian bank vs Tetrahedron ltd : Held bank not authorised to transfer property to person who was not a party to auction proceedings
[25/08, 09:49] Vinothpandian: 2018 (6) CTC 709 ; ondimuthu @ NO muthu vs Arulmigu meenskshi sundaraseshwar devasthanam : sec 47 CPC 1908 : once right to come on record as party in execution proceedings is negatived , application by same person under section 47 not maintainable
[25/08, 09:49] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 1283 : deputy chief controller vs KT kosalaram : dictionary meaning not to be mechanically applied , the context in which the word is used of importance in determining the precise sense which fits in with the context as intended by the author
[26/08, 09:50] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 539 : shanthimalai trust , tiruvanamalai vs Arunachala education : civil court shall not proceed to pass ex parte judgement within 30 days from the date of service of summons in suit
[26/08, 09:50] Vinothpandian: 2013 (11) SCC 404 ; priya gupta vs ministry of health & family welfare : Held bona fide apology tendered at the initial stage without lowering dignity of courts would persuade courts to accept it , apology tendered after wilful disobedience makes it difficult for acceptance
[26/08, 09:50] Vinothpandian: 2014 (5) CTC 118 : udhayakumar @ kumar vs G kishore kumar : court has power to reject irrelevant or inadmissible documents at any stage of proceedings ( order 7 rule 14 CPC 1908 )
[28/08, 07:11] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 149 : state of Rajasthan vs shambhu kewat : monetary compensation cannot wipe off crime against society , in such cases compounding of offences should not be entertained by the court ,
[28/08, 07:11] Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC (cri ) 307 : Ramswaroop vs state of MP : In a murder case , the court cannot impose a lesser sentence than what is prescribed in law
[28/08, 07:11] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction
[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 510 : Notified area council vs Titilagarh club : order 8 rule 9 CPC prohibits any pleadings subsequent to written statement of a defendant being filed other than by way of defence to a set off or counterclaim except by leave of court and upon such terms as court thinks fit
[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) CTC 198 : Thirumalai S vs S Govindarajan : unregistered partition deed cannot be admitted in evidence even for collateral purpose
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 363 : lanka venkateswarlu vs state of Andhra pradesh : If any application under section 5 of the limitation act is filed for condonation of delay on basis of enough reasons , concerned court often has liberal approach in respect there of
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2018(4)CTC 199: S Rathinavelu Chettiar trust vs R Padmanabha n ( died ) : section 12 contempt of courts act 1971 : contemnor agreed to vacate premises as per undertaking , wilful disobedience and breach of undertaking given to court , conduct of contemnors amount to playing fraud on court , contemnors are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay fine
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[02/09, 14:16] Vinothpandian: 2007 (10) SCC 614 : Neetu vs state of punjab : Easy access to justice should not be misused as licence to file misconceived and frivolous petition
[02/09, 14:16] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 820 : Kelukutty PM and others vs young mens christian association : deed transferring or creating any right in immovable property requires registration ( sec 58 (f) transfer of property act 1882 )
[02/09, 14:16] Vinothpandian: 1997 (5) SCC 170 : K jaganmohan vs state of kerala :In a selection process merely because a candidate was selected and kept in waiting list does not acquire any absolute right for appointment
[02/09, 14:16] Vinothpandian: 1999 (3) SCC 649 : Mitrangshu Roy choudhary vs union of india : In an organisation an apprentice cannot claim appointment as a matter of right as selection for apprenticeship is no guarantee or promise for employment
[03/09, 09:55] Vinothpandian: 2011 (9) SCC 94 : samar bahadur singh vs state of UP : Acquittal in criminal case has no bearing a relevance to departmental proceeding because the standard of proof in both of them is totally different
[03/09, 09:55] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) crimes 68 : Md sajjad @ Raju @ salim vs state of west bengal : Benefit of acquittal of appellant in criminal proceedings to be extended to non – appealing accused / appellant also
[03/09, 09:55] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) LW 172 : motilal vs BK babu sahib : while considering an application under order 7 rule 11 CPC , court to look into averments stated in the plaint alone while passing orders to reject the plaint
[04/09, 10:48] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 244 : B Rajarajeshwari vs presiding officer drt 2 : A litigant should not be put in a disadvantages situation by act of court , sec 152 of CPC equally applies to sec 26(2) and (3) of RDDBFI act 1993
