Follow:
- Next story [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13 life convicts, belonging to an intermediate caste, were released in 2019 to mark the MGR centenary celebrations. They were convicted of the charge of hacking to death six members of the Scheduled Caste in 1997, including Melavalavu panchayat president Murugesan, near Melur in [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: .
- Previous story THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍