Chennai to instruct the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Buildings), C&M Division, Salem to stop all construction activities of construction of State Level Cooperative Training Institute at Semmavaduvu Village, Manjakuttai Panchayat, Yercaud Taluk, Salem District. It has been further stated in the said order that, the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Salem also can be instructed that any further expenses in this regard would not be permitted. 2. Except this, nothing has been stated in the impugned order. Therefore, questioning this order the present writ petition has been filed. Mr.Arvind Pandian, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that, the Government already sanctioned Rs.61.80 Crores for construction of such Institute, pursuant to which the construction was going on. While that being so, all of a sudden now the stop construction order has since been issued, which is impugned herein, the reason for taking such a decision at Government level or Department level is not known to anyone and that has not been spelt out in the order, and in order to know the reasons and testify the same, the learned Senior Counsel seeks the indulgence of this Court. W.P. N o. 2 3 3 6 9 of 2021 R. SURESH KUMAR , J. kst 3. Considering the aforesaid aspect, this Court also feels that the respondents shall file a status report with concerned documents to establish that a Government level or Department level decision has been taken in this regard, pursuant to which 08.11.2021 KST
Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.R.P.PD(MD).Nos.909 and 915 of 2021 and CMP(MD)Nos.5177 and 5178 of 2021 C.R.P.PD(MD).No.909 of 2021 : 1.P.Ganesan : Petitioner/ Respondent Vs. M.Revathy Prema Rubarani : Respondent/ Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the petition in DVC.No.26 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and set aside the same.
- Previous story Musings on the Life & Times of Chinnaswamy Subramania Bharathi Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan 5
Recent Posts
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. Respondent/Proposed Contemnor the us AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER 1. S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Hindu, aged 54 years, residing at Flat No. 2787, TNHB Colony, Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai-625 009 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: 1. I am the petitioner herein and the petitioner in A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 30949.88% KB/S < 30 Bench would not have started or happeneu Thus, the proposed respondent has knowledge about the details of the implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court. The act of the proposed respondent is not only willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, but an ill-intended attack on the judicial system of our country. His statement has clearly established that he has no respect to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and he is above the law of the country. His statement also intended to mislead the general public that the government machinery is higher than the Judiciary and they are not obliged to follow the orders of the Courts. If this type of persons are allowed to make this type of statements, then the general public will lose confidence on the Courts which will result in serious damage to rule of law and peaceful life of the ordinary people. Hence the intentional act of the proposed respondent warranting action under sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Thus, it is just and necessary to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 in order to bring home the truth and to punish him. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Solemnly affirmed at Madurai this The 9th day of June 2026 and the contents of this affidavit were read out and explained to the deponent in Tamil deponent who understood the same put his/her signature in my presence. BEFORE ME ADVOCATE: MADURAI A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:29] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt refuses to transfer a disproportionate assets case pending against DMK former Minister Duraimurugan and his wife D. Shanthakumari from a special court for MP/MLA cases in Chennai to a special court in Vellore. The DVAC had booked the case in 2011 for the charge of having amassed ₹1.15 crore disproportionate to their known sources of income between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009 when the prime accused had served as Minister for Public Works Department, Prisons and Law @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt refuses to condone a delay of 839 days in preferring a third party criminal revision petition against the acquittal of former DMK Minister P. Geetha Jeevan and her family members from a 2002 disproportionate assets case. The case was primarily booked against her father N. Periasamy for having allegedly amassed ₹2.31 crore disproportionate to his known sources of income between 1996 and 2001 when he was the Thoothukudi MLA. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
More
Recent Posts
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt reserves orders on former DMK Minister K. Ponmudy’s plea to set aside a private complaint lodged against him by Greater Chennai Corporation BJP councillor Uma Anandan for his 2025 offensive speech against Vaishnavites, Saivites, and women in general. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- In this case too, a subsequent mention is made by the petitioners’ counsel, post lunch, that he intends to withdraw the petitions seeking transfer of the case. Judge accepts the plea and permits the petitioners to withdraw their petitions. Advocate Richardson Wilson said, the Supreme Court had stayed the trial and therefore, his clients do not wish to proceed further with the transfer plea.
- Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. Respondent/Proposed Contemnor the us AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER 1. S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Hindu, aged 54 years, residing at Flat No. 2787, TNHB Colony, Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai-625 009 do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows: 1. I am the petitioner herein and the petitioner in A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 30949.88% KB/S < 30 Bench would not have started or happeneu Thus, the proposed respondent has knowledge about the details of the implement the orders of this Hon'ble Court. The act of the proposed respondent is not only willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court, but an ill-intended attack on the judicial system of our country. His statement has clearly established that he has no respect to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and he is above the law of the country. His statement also intended to mislead the general public that the government machinery is higher than the Judiciary and they are not obliged to follow the orders of the Courts. If this type of persons are allowed to make this type of statements, then the general public will lose confidence on the Courts which will result in serious damage to rule of law and peaceful life of the ordinary people. Hence the intentional act of the proposed respondent warranting action under sections 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. Thus, it is just and necessary to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 in order to bring home the truth and to punish him. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to implead the 4th respondent herein as 4th respondent/4th contemnor in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render Justice. Solemnly affirmed at Madurai this The 9th day of June 2026 and the contents of this affidavit were read out and explained to the deponent in Tamil deponent who understood the same put his/her signature in my presence. BEFORE ME ADVOCATE: MADURAI A Edit Annotate Fill & Sign Convert All [25/06, 15:29] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Implead minister Nirmal kumar in Thirumaran kumaran deepam contempt case Sub application filed [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Sub appl 207/2026 [25/06, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Madurai [25/06, 15:31] sekarreporter1: 15:31 27.04G KB/S < 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADRAS AT MADURAI BENCH (Contempt Original Jurisdiction) Sub.Appln (MD)No. of 2026 in Contempt Petition (MD)No. 3657 of 2025 S. Paramasivam, S/o. Subramanian, Flat No.2787, TNHB Mela Anuppanadi, Madurai 625 009. ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -Vs- 1. Mr. K.J. Praveen Kumar, The District Collector, Madurai. 2. Mr. J. Loganathan The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 3. Mr. Yagnanarayanan, The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple, Thirupparankundram, Madurai. ... Respondents/Contemnors 4. Mr. R.Nirmal Kumar, S/o. Raja, Minister for Law & Electricity, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt refuses to transfer a disproportionate assets case pending against DMK former Minister Duraimurugan and his wife D. Shanthakumari from a special court for MP/MLA cases in Chennai to a special court in Vellore. The DVAC had booked the case in 2011 for the charge of having amassed ₹1.15 crore disproportionate to their known sources of income between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2009 when the prime accused had served as Minister for Public Works Department, Prisons and Law @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan of #MadrasHighCourt refuses to condone a delay of 839 days in preferring a third party criminal revision petition against the acquittal of former DMK Minister P. Geetha Jeevan and her family members from a 2002 disproportionate assets case. The case was primarily booked against her father N. Periasamy for having allegedly amassed ₹2.31 crore disproportionate to his known sources of income between 1996 and 2001 when he was the Thoothukudi MLA. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…