Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter- Republic Day function at High Court 2020 govt advts photos
- Previous story Family Pension to 2nd wife: Here’s why Madras High Court allowedCiting a Supreme Court judgment, Justice Anand Venkatesh allowed her petition and said “… this court has to necessarily lean towards the presumption of marriage rather than branding the petitioner as a concubine.”
Recent Posts
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-immoral-trafficking-act-search-mandatory-condition-not-for-commercial-premises-540126 [06/07, 19:42] Meta AI: *Case #140: _ITP Act Search – Mandatory Condition Not For Commercial Premises_ | http://CRL.OP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026*
- [06/07, 19:25] Sai Prasadl Delhi: Developed countries indulging in “waste colonialism” by shipping toxic waste to developing nations: Madras HC | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/developed-countries-indulging-in-waste-colonialism-by-shipping-toxic-waste-to-developing-nations-madras-hc [06/judge Baratha chakraverthy 07, 19:26] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Justice M Kumaresh Babu. Appearing for Ilaiyaraaja, his lawyer argued that the song had been altered and included in the film in violation of copyright law. After hearing the arguments, the court restrained the
- Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice R. Sakthivel further directed that if safety conditions are flouted during these races, strict disciplinary action must be initiated against the police officials who cleared the event.
- [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: Justice C. Kumarappan of #MadrasHighCourt permits DMK Gen Z wing coordinator A. Anbanantham to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition in a case booked under the Indecent Represention of Women (Prohibition) Act and other laws for his derogatory Instagram post against Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and a film actress besides making references to the CM’s wife and son too in the post. He chose to withdraw the petition after the Judge said he is not inclined to grant advance bail because the Instagram post “affects the conscience of the society. He (petitioner) has taken it as a carte blanche.” The judge refused to consider grant of relief even if the petitioner files an affidavit of apology and gives an undertaking that he would not speak such things in the future. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/… [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1:
More
Recent Posts
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-immoral-trafficking-act-search-mandatory-condition-not-for-commercial-premises-540126 [06/07, 19:42] Meta AI: *Case #140: _ITP Act Search – Mandatory Condition Not For Commercial Premises_ | http://CRL.OP *_/2026 | J. *_ | Madras HC | 2026*
- [06/07, 19:25] Sai Prasadl Delhi: Developed countries indulging in “waste colonialism” by shipping toxic waste to developing nations: Madras HC | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/developed-countries-indulging-in-waste-colonialism-by-shipping-toxic-waste-to-developing-nations-madras-hc [06/judge Baratha chakraverthy 07, 19:26] sekarreporter1: 👍
- Justice M Kumaresh Babu. Appearing for Ilaiyaraaja, his lawyer argued that the song had been altered and included in the film in violation of copyright law. After hearing the arguments, the court restrained the
- Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Justice R. Sakthivel further directed that if safety conditions are flouted during these races, strict disciplinary action must be initiated against the police officials who cleared the event.
- [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: Justice C. Kumarappan of #MadrasHighCourt permits DMK Gen Z wing coordinator A. Anbanantham to withdraw his anticipatory bail petition in a case booked under the Indecent Represention of Women (Prohibition) Act and other laws for his derogatory Instagram post against Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and a film actress besides making references to the CM’s wife and son too in the post. He chose to withdraw the petition after the Judge said he is not inclined to grant advance bail because the Instagram post “affects the conscience of the society. He (petitioner) has taken it as a carte blanche.” The judge refused to consider grant of relief even if the petitioner files an affidavit of apology and gives an undertaking that he would not speak such things in the future. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/… [06/07, 18:14] sekarreporter1: