You may also like...
-
-
Justice M. Nirmal Kumar ordered that the Mahila Court should complete the process of recording the statement, as required under Section 25 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012 before Thursday because only after that the police would be able to ascertain the veracity of the allegations.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 24, 2020
-
Sekarreporter law notes 31.1.2021: K. Selvaraj MHC Adv – The High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 can take cognizance of the entire facts and circumstances of the case and pass appropriate orders to give the parties complete and substantial justice, keeping in mind, the principles of equity which aim to promote honesty and fair play. Shangrila Fort Products Ltd. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India [(1996) 5 SCC 54]
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 31, 2021