Follow:
- Next story Smsj full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.27 of 2020 -++-The only question of law raised in the present second appeal is that whether the complaint/application filed by the respondent before the Regulatory Authority is maintainable or not. In view of the fact that the completion certificate issued by the Executive Officer, Town Panchayat is not in consonance either with the provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act as well as the building plan approval sanctioned by the Director of Town and Country Planning or in accordance with the provision of the RERA Act, the same cannot be construed as a valid certificate for the purpose of grant of exclusion under Section 3(2)(b) of the RERA Act. The certificate is to be construed as insignificant and irrelevant as far as the RERA Act is concerned and for all purposes, the building is to be treated as on-going project. Therefore, the appellants/builders are bound to comply with the terms and conditions in the project as well as comply with the provisions of various laws governing real estate affairs. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association is maintainable under the provisions of the RERA Act, 2016 and accordingly, the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal stands confirmed and consequently, Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. The Regulatory Authority is directed to entertain the application/complaint filed by the respondents/apartment owners association and adjudicate the issues on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to all the parties concerned and accordingly, pass speaking final orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- Previous story Judge v parthoban j notice orderedMADURAI Conservancy worker’s wife moves HC for compensation
Recent Posts
- 16:59] sekarreporter1: “Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan observed, “The expression ‘betting and gambling’ cannot be split to mean that the staking angle alone would amount to betting whereas the risk angle” https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/state-of-tamil-nadu-v-junglee-games-india-pvt-ltd-2026-insc-594-banning-online-rummy-poker
- The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Teacher Eligibility Test is a constitutional necessity, not a procedural formality, flowing directly from the right to quality education guaranteed under Article 21-A of the Constitution of India. Holding that no exemption in
- THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP Crl. No. 1201 of 2026 AND WPMP CRL. No. 414 of 2026 T.Devanathan Yadav S/o. Thiruvengadam, No. 3, Deenadayalu Street, T.Nagar, Chennai
- Justice G.R. Swaminathan of #MadrasHighCourt: I was sick three weeks ago and went to my family doctor. He told me that on the day of polling, his grandchild had persuaded upon him to vote for TVK (In a lighter vein) Senior Counsel S. Muralidhar for #TVK: We have in our tradition, children advising the father. Your Lordship’s name also symbolises that. (The senior counsel was referring to the meaning of the name Swaminathan ‘Teacher of the Lord,’ the other name of Lord Murugan who according to a legend had turned into a Guru to his father Lord Shiva). @THChennai
- sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Grants ITC Interim Injunction Over Alleged Infringement Of Classmate Trademark https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-grants-itc-interim-injunction-over-alleged-infringement-of-classmate-trademark-536179 [30/05, 11:54] sekarreporter1: TOP STORIES SUPREME COURT & HIGH COURTS IBC IPR GST/VAT/CST CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX Top
More
Recent Posts
- 16:59] sekarreporter1: “Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan observed, “The expression ‘betting and gambling’ cannot be split to mean that the staking angle alone would amount to betting whereas the risk angle” https://www.verdictum.in/supreme-court/state-of-tamil-nadu-v-junglee-games-india-pvt-ltd-2026-insc-594-banning-online-rummy-poker
- The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Teacher Eligibility Test is a constitutional necessity, not a procedural formality, flowing directly from the right to quality education guaranteed under Article 21-A of the Constitution of India. Holding that no exemption in
- THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP Crl. No. 1201 of 2026 AND WPMP CRL. No. 414 of 2026 T.Devanathan Yadav S/o. Thiruvengadam, No. 3, Deenadayalu Street, T.Nagar, Chennai
- Justice G.R. Swaminathan of #MadrasHighCourt: I was sick three weeks ago and went to my family doctor. He told me that on the day of polling, his grandchild had persuaded upon him to vote for TVK (In a lighter vein) Senior Counsel S. Muralidhar for #TVK: We have in our tradition, children advising the father. Your Lordship’s name also symbolises that. (The senior counsel was referring to the meaning of the name Swaminathan ‘Teacher of the Lord,’ the other name of Lord Murugan who according to a legend had turned into a Guru to his father Lord Shiva). @THChennai
- sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Grants ITC Interim Injunction Over Alleged Infringement Of Classmate Trademark https://www.livelawbiz.com/trademark/madras-high-court-grants-itc-interim-injunction-over-alleged-infringement-of-classmate-trademark-536179 [30/05, 11:54] sekarreporter1: TOP STORIES SUPREME COURT & HIGH COURTS IBC IPR GST/VAT/CST CUSTOMS/EXCISE/SERVICE TAX Top