Follow:
- Next story Dmk trust case mhc judge antha sumanth
- Previous story Advt Purusothaman: Today Hon’ble First Bench of Madras High Court passed orders, in the writ petiton filed by a practising Advocate who earlier was unable to writ the examination owing to his having crossed the upper age limit for all categories by 29 days,Mr.V.Packiaraj from Madurai,
Recent Posts
- 1)Absence of principal charge on account of death of main accused, other accused facing corresponding charge cannot be proceeded against. 2)Absence of corroborating evidence between A1 and A2 on charges of 9(1) (b) and 9 (1) (d) of fera, 1973..of payment and receipt on behalf of person resident outside india..not examined or statement recorded makes charges unsustainable.
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.A.No.25 of 2019 The Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India. Shastri Bhavan, Chennai-600.006 …. Appellant Vs. C. Sampath Kumar … Respondent
- பெண்கள் மசூதிக்கு போகலாம், ஆனா நிபந்தனை உண்டு” – AIMPLB சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் விளக்கம்*
- Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has clarified that issuing two separate GST orders for the same discrepancies in the financial year 2021-22 is not permissible. The court granted relief to taxpayers by providing them with a new opportunity for a hearing in their case.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2047998008508453265 [25/04, 16:46] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 16:45] Palanimuthu: NPAC conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016. “From Resolution to Resilience Reimagining India’s Corporate Restructuring Landscape” held in Chennai on 25/04/2026. Hon’ble Justice Mr.R.Mahadevan, Judge, Supreme Court of India, Hon’ble Justice Mr.V.Laxminarayanan, Judge, Madras High Court, Hon’ble Justice Mr.Senthilkumar Ramamurthy, Judge, Madras High Court addressed the gathering. Advocate M.Palanimuthu and Senior Manager (Law) of AAI are with Justice Mr. SKRJ. [25/04, 16:45] sekarreporter1:
More
Recent Posts
- 1)Absence of principal charge on account of death of main accused, other accused facing corresponding charge cannot be proceeded against. 2)Absence of corroborating evidence between A1 and A2 on charges of 9(1) (b) and 9 (1) (d) of fera, 1973..of payment and receipt on behalf of person resident outside india..not examined or statement recorded makes charges unsustainable.
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.A.No.25 of 2019 The Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India. Shastri Bhavan, Chennai-600.006 …. Appellant Vs. C. Sampath Kumar … Respondent
- பெண்கள் மசூதிக்கு போகலாம், ஆனா நிபந்தனை உண்டு” – AIMPLB சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் விளக்கம்*
- Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has clarified that issuing two separate GST orders for the same discrepancies in the financial year 2021-22 is not permissible. The court granted relief to taxpayers by providing them with a new opportunity for a hearing in their case.
- sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2047998008508453265 [25/04, 16:46] sekarreporter1: [25/04, 16:45] Palanimuthu: NPAC conference on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,2016. “From Resolution to Resilience Reimagining India’s Corporate Restructuring Landscape” held in Chennai on 25/04/2026. Hon’ble Justice Mr.R.Mahadevan, Judge, Supreme Court of India, Hon’ble Justice Mr.V.Laxminarayanan, Judge, Madras High Court, Hon’ble Justice Mr.Senthilkumar Ramamurthy, Judge, Madras High Court addressed the gathering. Advocate M.Palanimuthu and Senior Manager (Law) of AAI are with Justice Mr. SKRJ. [25/04, 16:45] sekarreporter1: