![https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579637908117811200?t=m0aM7ZKLMw1mjavdD961Tw&s=08 [10/11, 06:30] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:28] Sekarreporter 1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *V.S.B. Educational Trust Vs. University Grants Commission & 2 Ors.* W.P. No.24797 of 2022 Dated: 29.09.2022](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story ] V subramani Advt: Writ was filed by company to quash the order of district collector refusing permission to enter into lands of farmers to install transmission towers…While quashing the order..Honble justice GRSJ..directed the company to provide adequate compensation and to ensure that least inconvenience is caused to land owners ..it futher clarified that there cant be any difference between govt entities and private companies while granting permission by collectors under Telegraph Act..full order
- Previous story Online case sgp munusamy sir interview tv news
Recent Posts
- appellant leased out acquired lands for developing Industrial Park for a period of 99 years for a lease amount of Rs.1/- p.a. and therefore, Clause 39 of the lease agreement would squarely apply for recovering sub-leasing charges. Further, SIPCOT is empowered to impose conditions and
- Mother-Father Temple Street) has been rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge, as no mandamus can be issued to the State authorities in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the street to be given a particular name.
- Naming of a street is certainly not liable to be interfered with the exercise of the powers under Article 226. 6. As the petitioner has no legal righ
- referred to the Vigilance Cell of the Madras High Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to hear this case. It is appropriate that the matter is placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for posting before an appropriate Bench
- cycling rally was flagged off in the presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy of the Madras High Court,
More
Recent Posts
- appellant leased out acquired lands for developing Industrial Park for a period of 99 years for a lease amount of Rs.1/- p.a. and therefore, Clause 39 of the lease agreement would squarely apply for recovering sub-leasing charges. Further, SIPCOT is empowered to impose conditions and
- Mother-Father Temple Street) has been rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge, as no mandamus can be issued to the State authorities in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the street to be given a particular name.
- Naming of a street is certainly not liable to be interfered with the exercise of the powers under Article 226. 6. As the petitioner has no legal righ
- referred to the Vigilance Cell of the Madras High Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to hear this case. It is appropriate that the matter is placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for posting before an appropriate Bench
- cycling rally was flagged off in the presence of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy of the Madras High Court,