You may also like...
-
The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court has held that Electropathy/ Electro Homeopathy system of medicine cannot be allowed to propel, as the same is not recognized under any law in India. Dismissing a batch of petitions filed by practitioners in Electropathy, Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana held, “Most of the certificates produced by the petitioners in the typed set of papers, in respect of their claim of obtaining Diploma in Electro Homeopathy, are issued by some private institutions without affiliation to anyone of the statutory bodies / universities recognized by the Acts of the Parliament. The petitioners, who claimed to have undergone a diploma course in the so-called alternative stream of medicine, without even verifying the genuineness of the statutory recognition, status of the institute joined the course, throws serious doubt about the genuineness in their very claim. Having obtained diplomas from such institutes, the petitioners are estopped from claiming any right either to register themselves in the roles of the statutory council or practice in that particular stream of medicine.”
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 13, 2020
-
16.As seen from the above, the Supreme Court also dealt with Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and held that mere support to a banned organization will not by itself can become an offence. 9.That apart, when the petitioner claims that he requires eight hours to complete the programme, the condition that the programme should be conducted between 10 a.m. to 13.00 p.m. is also not proper and appropriate. Similarly, when the Police is going to cover the programme for legal scrutiny, they can also video-graph the event. They cannot require the petitioner to video-graph the entire programme and submit it to the petitioner. Therefore, aforesaid conditions namely condition Nos.1, 3 and 4 are set aside. Petitioner may be given eight hours time to conduct the programme from 10.00 a.m. on 23.12.2022. The respondent can make its own arrangement for videographing the oratory competition. It is made clear that the speech shall not be against the sovereignty of the nation, should not affect the sovereignty of the friendly relations of SAARC nations. Other conditions are upheld. 10.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.01.2023 ep Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J., ep To 1.The Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai – 107. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. W.P. No.339 of 2023 10.01.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 14, 2023
-
Sofiya case compensation HON’BLE THIRU D.JAYACHANDRAN, B.A., B.L., MEMBER. Dr.A.A.Samy … Complainant
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 2, 2022
