![We are, thus, of the view that the impugned judgment dated 31.5.2018 of the High Court is liable to be set aside and the challenge to the award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 21.2.2013 is repelled. The appeal is accordingly allowed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. ………………………………J. [Sanjay Kishan Kaul] ………………………………J. [M.M. Sundresh] New Delhi. January 19, 2022. [1] (2003) 3 SCC 583 [2] 2020 SCC Online SC 782. [3] (2020) 9 SCC 636](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [3/2, 07:30] sekarreporter1: Judge kumaresh babu directed medical college to refund 10.5 L to a student [3/2, 07:30] sekarreporter1: 🌹
- Previous story justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan on two petitions filed in 2019 to protect the said 9.49-acre land belonging to Kodandaramaswamy temple — that comes under the Thirumohur temple administration
Recent Posts
- Breaking: _PIL in SC to Probe “Cockroach Janta Party” + Fake Law Degrees_
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.
More
Recent Posts
- Breaking: _PIL in SC to Probe “Cockroach Janta Party” + Fake Law Degrees_
- Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere non-registration of a will cannot be treated as a circumstance casting suspicion on its genuineness, emphasizing that Indian law does not mandate registration of wills
- Pmla case anitha radakrishnan
- Justice Pugalendhi noted that both the high court and the Supreme Court, in similar petitions, have recognised the labour inspector’s right to confer permanent status on eligible employees.
- The Supreme Court on Friday modified its March 11 order that had directed the Centre, states and others to disassociate from three academics, following a row over an NCERT book chapter containing “offending” contents on corruption in the judiciary.