[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: “Holding that the writ petition was not maintainable, the High Court dismissed it. It, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to avail of remedies in accordance with the statutory election law framework. For Petitioner: M. Karthikeyan For Respondents: A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (R1); Mr. Niranjan Rajagopalan, Standing Counsel (R2 to R4); Mr. Masilamani, Senior Advocate for Ms. M.B. Ramya (R5)” https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/election-affidavit-disputes-must-be-raised-through-election-petition-538943#:~:text=Holding%20that%20the,B.%20Ramya%20(R5) [26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: 👍
[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: "Holding that the writ petition was not maintainable, the High Court dismissed it. It, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to avail of remedies in accordance with the statutory election law framework.
For Petitioner: M. Karthikeyan
For Respondents: A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (R1); Mr. Niranjan Rajagopalan, Standing Counsel (R2 to R4); Mr. Masilamani, Senior Advocate for Ms. M.B. Ramya (R5)"
https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/election-affidavit-disputes-must-be-raised-through-election-petition-538943#:~:text=Holding%20that%20the,B.%20Ramya%20(R5)
[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: 👍
