SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: June 26, 2026

Land mark order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL RC No. 950 of 2026 1.Sri Nandhini Devi @ Srinandhini Devi Saravanan, W/o Saravanan, H15/1097/1, Anbu Nagar TNHB, Mohanur Road, Namakkal. 2.Saravanan @ Saravanan Kandasamy S/o Kandasamy, H15/1097/1, Anbu Nagar TNHB, Mohanur Road, Namakkal. 3.Kiruthiga Perumal @ Karthiga W/o Raja, 130/8, A.D.Street, Palayur, Karur. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

Land mark order THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL RC No. 950 of 2026 1.Sri Nandhini Devi @ Srinandhini Devi Saravanan, W/o Saravanan, H15/1097/1, Anbu Nagar TNHB, Mohanur Road, Namakkal. 2.Saravanan @ Saravanan Kandasamy S/o Kandasamy, H15/1097/1, Anbu Nagar TNHB, Mohanur Road, Namakkal. 3.Kiruthiga Perumal @ Karthiga W/o Raja, 130/8, A.D.Street, Palayur, Karur. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 19-06-2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 25.06.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED CRL RC No. 950 of 2026 1.Sri Nandhini Devi @ Srinandhini Devi...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

வாடகைத் தாய் சட்டத்தில் வரலாற்றுச் சிறப்புமிக்க தீர்ப்பு: குறைபாடுகளை காரணம் காட்டி பெற்றோர் ஆகும் உரிமையை பறிக்க கூடாது; மேஜிஸ்திரேட்டுகளுக்கு விரிவான வழிகாட்டுதல்கள்; சரோக்கசி சட்டத்தின் கீழ் தாக்கல் செய்யப்படும் அனைத்து மனுக்களையும் 4 வாரங்களுக்குள் முடிவெடுக்க உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு

*வாடகைத் தாய் சட்டத்தில் வரலாற்றுச் சிறப்புமிக்க தீர்ப்பு: குறைபாடுகளை காரணம் காட்டி பெற்றோர் ஆகும் உரிமையை பறிக்க கூடாது; மேஜிஸ்திரேட்டுகளுக்கு விரிவான வழிகாட்டுதல்கள்; சரோக்கசி சட்டத்தின் கீழ் தாக்கல் செய்யப்படும் அனைத்து மனுக்களையும் 4 வாரங்களுக்குள் முடிவெடுக்க உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு* *மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் அசன் முகமது ஜின்னா...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx2RBbVLa0aiQpNokyXT_mk1JpKlkImpUU?si=f9c3q8TM7eTRw20i [26/06, 10:11] sekarreporter1: *Landmark Madras High Court Ruling on Surrogacy Law: Technicalities Cannot Defeat Parenthood; Detailed Guidelines Issued to Magistrates; All Parentage and Custody Petitions Under the Surrogacy Act to be Decided Within Four Weeks*

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx2RBbVLa0aiQpNokyXT_mk1JpKlkImpUU?si=f9c3q8TM7eTRw20i [26/06, 10:11] sekarreporter1: *Landmark Madras High Court Ruling on Surrogacy Law: Technicalities Cannot Defeat Parenthood; Detailed Guidelines Issued to Magistrates; All Parentage and Custody Petitions Under the Surrogacy Act to be Decided Within Four Weeks*

[26/06, 10:11] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx2RBbVLa0aiQpNokyXT_mk1JpKlkImpUU?si=f9c3q8TM7eTRw20i [26/06, 10:11] sekarreporter1: *Landmark Madras High Court Ruling on Surrogacy Law: Technicalities Cannot Defeat Parenthood; Detailed Guidelines Issued to Magistrates; All Parentage and Custody Petitions Under the Surrogacy Act to...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxf3N9-ikHJ2OAolOGPV4uUuxFtUVLZfRM?si=MlvruYAdQrmYDoMh [26/06, 08:57] sekarreporter1: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt adjourns to Tuesday (June 30, 2026) the hearing on a plea by film director Gautam Vasudev Menon to extend the time given for the release of Chiyaan Vikra

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxf3N9-ikHJ2OAolOGPV4uUuxFtUVLZfRM?si=MlvruYAdQrmYDoMh [26/06, 08:57] sekarreporter1: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt adjourns to Tuesday (June 30, 2026) the hearing on a plea by film director Gautam Vasudev Menon to extend the time given for the release of Chiyaan Vikra

[26/06, 08:56] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxf3N9-ikHJ2OAolOGPV4uUuxFtUVLZfRM?si=MlvruYAdQrmYDoMh [26/06, 08:57] sekarreporter1: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt adjourns to Tuesday (June 30, 2026) the hearing on a plea by film director Gautam Vasudev Menon to extend the time given...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan, while extending the interim injunction, directed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to file a reply to the petition filed by the former minister, seeking to vacate the interim stay, within two

TNIE Logo white INDIA WORLD STATES CITIES OPINION EXPLAINER BUSINESS SPORTS GOOD NEWS MOVIES VIDEOS Advertisement Tamil Nadu Madras HC extends interim stay against DA proceedings against former minister The court granted an interim...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: “Holding that the writ petition was not maintainable, the High Court dismissed it. It, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to avail of remedies in accordance with the statutory election law framework. For Petitioner: M. Karthikeyan For Respondents: A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (R1); Mr. Niranjan Rajagopalan, Standing Counsel (R2 to R4); Mr. Masilamani, Senior Advocate for Ms. M.B. Ramya (R5)” https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/election-affidavit-disputes-must-be-raised-through-election-petition-538943#:~:text=Holding%20that%20the,B.%20Ramya%20(R5) [26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: 👍

Uncategorized

 by · Published June 26, 2026

[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: “Holding that the writ petition was not maintainable, the High Court dismissed it. It, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to avail of remedies in accordance with the statutory election law framework. For Petitioner: M. Karthikeyan For Respondents: A.P. Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel (R1); Mr. Niranjan Rajagopalan, Standing Counsel (R2 to R4); Mr. Masilamani, Senior Advocate for Ms. M.B. Ramya (R5)” https://www.livelawbiz.com/income-tax/high-court/election-affidavit-disputes-must-be-raised-through-election-petition-538943#:~:text=Holding%20that%20the,B.%20Ramya%20(R5) [26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: 👍

[26/06, 08:13] sekarreporter1: “Holding that the writ petition was not maintainable, the High Court dismissed it. It, however, granted liberty to the petitioner to avail of remedies in accordance with the statutory election law...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version