SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: May 2026

https://youtu.be/m_gnlQJsWkg?si=cva6YHuhzcNJSRrN [02/05, 16:11] sekarreporter1: IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI Present :Thiru.S.Karthikeyan, M.A., M.L., M.Sc., PGDCFSc., PGDDF., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday, the 30th day of April, 2026. Crl.M.P.Nos.3737, 3759, 3776, 3915/2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.4071, 4069 and 4068/2026 (Intervene Petitions) in Cyber Crime Wing (CCW) Crime No.47/2026 Srinath @ Sriram .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3737/2026 / Accused 1. Sanjay 2. Bala @ Balakrishnan 3. Manigandan 4. Ruthran .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3759/2026 / Accused Rajesh .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3776/2026 / Accused 1. Prasanth 2. Selvam 3. Rajini .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3915/2026 / Accused Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, CCD-I, CCW-SCCIC Chennai. ..Respondent/Complainant. This petition is coming on this day before this court for hearing in the presence of M/s.G.Prabhakaran, K.Ram Sankar, S.Jayaprakash,

Uncategorized

https://youtu.be/m_gnlQJsWkg?si=cva6YHuhzcNJSRrN [02/05, 16:11] sekarreporter1: IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI Present :Thiru.S.Karthikeyan, M.A., M.L., M.Sc., PGDCFSc., PGDDF., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday, the 30th day of April, 2026. Crl.M.P.Nos.3737, 3759, 3776, 3915/2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.4071, 4069 and 4068/2026 (Intervene Petitions) in Cyber Crime Wing (CCW) Crime No.47/2026 Srinath @ Sriram .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3737/2026 / Accused 1. Sanjay 2. Bala @ Balakrishnan 3. Manigandan 4. Ruthran .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3759/2026 / Accused Rajesh .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.3776/2026 / Accused 1. Prasanth 2. Selvam 3. Rajini .. Petitioners in Crl.M.P.No.3915/2026 / Accused Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, CCD-I, CCW-SCCIC Chennai. ..Respondent/Complainant. This petition is coming on this day before this court for hearing in the presence of M/s.G.Prabhakaran, K.Ram Sankar, S.Jayaprakash,

[02/05, 16:10] sekarreporter1: [02/05, 16:11] sekarreporter1: IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, CHENNAI Present :Thiru.S.Karthikeyan, M.A., M.L., M.Sc., PGDCFSc., PGDDF., Principal Sessions Judge. Thursday, the 30th day of April, 2026. Crl.M.P.Nos.3737, 3759, 3776,...

Uncategorized

The Chief Secretary to the State of Tamil Nadu and the Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, are suo motu impleaded as respondents 4 and 5, and the directions contained in paragraphs 49 to 53 above shall be complied with in letter and spirit. (v) Registry shall carry out the amendment in the cause title. (vi) Post the case for compliance on 21.01.2027 by the 4th and 5th respondents. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to file an elaborate report as to the steps taken in complying the directions passed by this order on 21.01.2027. 30.04.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22813 of 2025 1. G. Rajesh @ Rajeshkumar 2. S. Vijay...

Uncategorized

Madras HC | Justice L. Victoria Gowri* *Case*: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8298 of 2024 | *Petitioners*: T. Lenin & family — *1. Key Ruling* *HC refused to quash criminal proceedings*. Held that defences must be tested at trial, not under Sec 482 CrPC.

[02/05, 14:06] sekarreporter1: “This Court is of the view that these are classic matters of defence. Inherent jurisdiction cannot be transformed into forum for testing contradictions. As held in Kamal Shivaji Pokarnekar v. State...

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2. L.Vennila 3. L.Vivek Eswar 4. L.Abinisha … Petitioner/Accused No. Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Pattukottai,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 27.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8298 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.5646 and 5647 of 2024 1. T.Lenin 2....

Uncategorized

Madras HC says you can’t kill a case at the notice stage. If allegations look like an offence on face value, the magistrate should hear it. Advocates must defend themselves there, not get HC to quash it early.

[02/05, 12:35] sekarreporter1: “Justice Gowri agreed and refused to interfere. The court noted that the petitions challenged only show cause notices and that the advocates could present their defence before the magistrate. It held...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com