Follow:
Recent Posts
- #BREAKING Appeal filed in Supreme Court against Madras High Court order rejecting anticipatory bail application filed by former Tamil Nadu minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) MLA V Senthil Balaji in a corruption case concerning alleged irregularities in the functioning of the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) Sr Adv Kapil Sibal and Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi appear for Balaji: It was passed today at 10:30 am. We have filed SLP CJI Surya Kant: List it tomorrow
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP(MD). No.3449 of 2026 M/s.One World Industrial Textile Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Mr.Shyam Prakash Fatehpuria, Having its Registered Office at BS-18, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai-625 008 … Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Msme, Kartavya Bhawan, Building No.03, Kartavya Path, New Delhi-110001. 2.The Director, Ministry of Textiles, Office of the Textile Commissioner,
- Dismissed THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WA Nos. 3735 and 110 of 2025 WA.No.3735 of 2025: K. Karthikesan ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. ICICI Bank Limited Rep. by its The Managing Director and Executive Officer, ICICI Towers Ambattur Industrial Estate, Ambattur – 058. 2. The Regional Manager ICICI Bank Limited, 7/A, Reynolds Road, Cantonment, Trichy-1
- The Registrar General, Madras High Court, after obtaining necessary administrative orders from My Lord, Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court, shall issue a Circular to all Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in the State of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, for strict compliance on all the aforesaid aspects, so as to ensure the protection and timely disbursement of just compensation to claimants, in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.” (N.S.K.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.)
- spondent under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, seeking cancellation of the settlement deed as well as eviction of the petitioners. The second respondent rejected the request
More
Recent Posts
- #BREAKING Appeal filed in Supreme Court against Madras High Court order rejecting anticipatory bail application filed by former Tamil Nadu minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) MLA V Senthil Balaji in a corruption case concerning alleged irregularities in the functioning of the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) Sr Adv Kapil Sibal and Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi appear for Balaji: It was passed today at 10:30 am. We have filed SLP CJI Surya Kant: List it tomorrow
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP(MD). No.3449 of 2026 M/s.One World Industrial Textile Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Mr.Shyam Prakash Fatehpuria, Having its Registered Office at BS-18, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Kappalur, Madurai-625 008 … Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Msme, Kartavya Bhawan, Building No.03, Kartavya Path, New Delhi-110001. 2.The Director, Ministry of Textiles, Office of the Textile Commissioner,
- Dismissed THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WA Nos. 3735 and 110 of 2025 WA.No.3735 of 2025: K. Karthikesan ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. ICICI Bank Limited Rep. by its The Managing Director and Executive Officer, ICICI Towers Ambattur Industrial Estate, Ambattur – 058. 2. The Regional Manager ICICI Bank Limited, 7/A, Reynolds Road, Cantonment, Trichy-1
- The Registrar General, Madras High Court, after obtaining necessary administrative orders from My Lord, Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court, shall issue a Circular to all Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in the State of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, for strict compliance on all the aforesaid aspects, so as to ensure the protection and timely disbursement of just compensation to claimants, in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.” (N.S.K.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.)
- spondent under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, seeking cancellation of the settlement deed as well as eviction of the petitioners. The second respondent rejected the request