Senior Advocate Raghavachari also appears for Seenivasan. Court: Are you appearing as a future…? (Hinting if he is the new Advocate General) Raghavachari: I am only appearing for a client milord. My submission is that this is an interim prayer only in the election petition before the election court.
Senior Advocate Raghavachari also appears for Seenivasan. Court: Are you appearing as a future…? (Hinting if he is the new Advocate General) Raghavachari: I am only appearing for a client milord. My submission is...
![[10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: How can they say RO is wrong when the complaint never reached him? He is neither divine nor astrological milord. The ones which have reached are about material irregularities. [10/05, 12:28] sekarreporter1: Singhvi: what crime has the RO committed? Completely misplaced. Obviously there is none! The man doesn’t bother to make the RO decisions or non-decision a part of the writ. Court: What is the procedure to be adopted in such case? [10/05, 11:15] sekarreporter1: Rohatgi: This is such a rare circumstance, according to me if a letter is addressed to a wrong house, it should be brought back to the correct house. Court: Is there any procedure by ECI?](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)