SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: April 8, 2026

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

this Court, recording the counter affidavit filed on behalf of HR&CE, that “…Totally 73 Yagasalai Kundams are provided. The temple will make arrangements to engage 36 vedic tamil scholars to perform yagasalai velvi in Tamil in respect of 36 Yagasalai Kundams. The balance 36 Yagasalai velvi kundams will be performed in sanskrit”, allowed to perform the function on 30.03.2025, however, the same was not performed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CONT P No. 1085 of 2026 D.Sureshbabu President, Sandigeswarar Seva Trust, No.40,Sakthi Nagar, Vinayagar Kovil Street Uppilipalayam Post,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

ENACT A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR FORMER JUDGES (Resolution passed by National Council of Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad on 5th April 2026, at Samalakha, Haryana) Akhil Bharatiya Adhivakta Parishad expresses its dismay at retired judges of Indian constitutional courts appearing as expert witnesses before foreign courts in support of fugitives from Indian justice.

[08/04, 13:48] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxb_–cEPo1XT4SjfW39KFJrobeWC7s8Tv?si=3t42EM57wRdBeED4 [08/04, 13:48] sekarreporter1: AKHIL BHARATIYA ADHIVAKTA PARISHAD Reg. No. 39403/2001 50, Pravasi Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Deendayal Upadhyaya Marg, New Delhi-110002 Ph. :- 011-23213469, Email: centralofficeabap@gmail.com    Web: www.adhivaktaparishad.org  Sh. K. Srinivasa...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

[08/04, 13:15] sekarreporter1: 1. WP 12656 of 2026. Item 4 for Admission before the Honourable First Bench. P. Baskar Vs State. Prayer :- WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records made in the Impugned Order issued by the 1’t respondent vide G.O.(D) No.15 dated 74.01.20″16 and QUASH the same as illegal, void and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents hereln not to break or operate the Fixed Deposit of the temple 2. Counsel for Petitioner- B. Jagannath, Learned Senior Advocate R. Shunmugasundaram for Respondents- assisted by R. Bharanidharan & Learned Senior Counsel AK Sriram for Hr and Ce Appeared. 3. ⁠Petitioner Counsel B. Jagannath stated that Masani Amman temple is a famous and landmark temple having fixed deposit of more than Rs.120 Crores and contravention to Section 46,47 of the Act Fit person- 5th Respondent has been appointed – Instead of appointment of trustees- that too when application form & notification was called for in March last year in paper publication for appointment of trustees for the temple. There’s nothing personal against the 5th Respondent – it’s a challenge to the appointment in light of legal infraction. The apprehension is that there is Rs120 Crores fixed deposit and that the Fixed Deposit cannot be used as last year during same period – Fixed deposit was sought to be broken for construction of luxury resort in Ooty -which was dropped due to timely intervention of the Petitioner in another last year. It’s been 1 year and till date no Trustees have been appointed. There can be no major policy decision taken without trustees appointment- FIT person cannot do so as per section 46,47,48 of the Act. 4. ⁠The Bench posed a question to the Respondents why Trustees are not appointed for 1 year- if that is so then what is the rationale for appointment of FIT Person now in 2026. 5.Per Contra – Learned Senior Advocate R. Shanmugasundaram – assisted by R. Bharanidharan stated that the appointment of FIT person is a temporary interim Stop Gap arrangement. It is only for a temporary period. The luxury resort proposal was dropped last year itself. There is no decision or proposal to break the Fixed Deposit till the appointment of Trustees. Furthermore, application form of trustees has been scrutinised – certain candidates have been identified and the Respondents after the election shall undertake promptly to appoint trustees in accordance with law. Hence the apprehension of the petitioner is allayed & answered accordingly. Also, appointment of Respondent 5 is only temporary in nature till trustees are appointed . After hearing the arguments from both sides , the Learned First Bench – stated that detailed orders will be passed. [08/04, 13:15] sekarreporter1: 👍👍

[08/04, 13:15] sekarreporter1: 1. WP 12656 of 2026. Item 4 for Admission before the Honourable First Bench. P. Baskar Vs State. Prayer :- WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records made in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

திருப்பரங்குன்றம் விவகாரத்தை அரசியல் விஷயமாக பயன்படுத்தாதீர்கள்: நீதிபதிகள் சட்ட விதிகளின் அடிப்படையில் மட்டுமே முடிவெடுக்கப்படும்: நீதிபதிகள்

[08/04, 12:43] sekarreporter1: [08/04, 12:41] sekarreporter1: Thiruparankundram Deepam matter: the Hon’ble Division Bench comprising Justices NSKJ and MJRJ advised the learned Senior Counsel Mr. N.R. Elango and Mr. Sriram to obtain necessary instructions from...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
#MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Justice G.Arul Murugan once again rejected an oral request made on behalf of Pattali Makkal Katchi founder S. Ramadoss for an urgent hearing of a case seeking to freeze the ‘mango’ symbol. Judges say the case will be listed in the routine course only after it gets numbered. @THChennai

Uncategorized

 by · Published April 8, 2026

#MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Justice G.Arul Murugan once again rejected an oral request made on behalf of Pattali Makkal Katchi founder S. Ramadoss for an urgent hearing of a case seeking to freeze the ‘mango’ symbol. Judges say the case will be listed in the routine course only after it gets numbered. @THChennai

#MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Justice G.Arul Murugan once again rejected an oral request made on behalf of Pattali Makkal Katchi founder S. Ramadoss for an urgent hearing of a case seeking...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version