Daily Archive: March 17, 2026

When Senior Counsel P.S. Raman (who is also the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu) represented Chennai Super Kings and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran (who is also the Additional Advocate General) represented Sun TV Network Limited before #MadrasHighCourt in a copyright infringement suit Mr. Ravindran: I am now in an unfortunate situation MiLord where I am pitted against my own A-G Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy: He is not appearing as the A-G in this case Mr. Ravindran: But I am used to calling him so and therefore it becomes very hard to change it suddenly.

When Senior Counsel P.S. Raman (who is also the Advocate General of Tamil Nadu) represented Chennai Super Kings and Senior Counsel J. Ravindran (who is also the Additional Advocate General) represented Sun TV Network...

Vinothpandian: Madras High court : WP no 2673 of 2026 B Gurusamy vs director general of police 11th March 2026 : Held scope for high courts to interfere in academic matters is limited , re – evaluation or scrutiny permitted only in rare or exceptional cases where material error is

[17/03, 11:53] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : WP no 2673 of 2026 B Gurusamy vs director general of police 11th March 2026 : Held scope for high courts to interfere in academic matters is...

By placing this issue before your Lordship, we sincerely hope that the grievances of the Advocates will be taken into consideration and suitably resolved  Yours faithfully,   (G.MOHANAKRISHNAN) Ex-PRESIDENT MADRAS HIGHCOURT ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION. [17/03, 10:45] sekarreporter1

By placing this issue before your Lordship, we sincerely hope that the grievances of the Advocates will be taken into consideration and suitably resolved Yours faithfully, (G.MOHANAKRISHNAN) Ex-PRESIDENT MADRAS HIGHCOURT ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION. [17/03, 10:45] sekarreporter1

[17/03, 10:45] sekarreporter1: To Hon’ble Chief Justice of Madras High Court, Madras High Court. Hon’ble Lordship, The Department of Legal Affairs Notary Cell vide their order dated 12.03.2026 had appointed 3416 Advocates as Notary...

Nskj bench Further, Rules 8(b) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, deals with only when the punishment involves in a serious crime and the conviction for the serious crime, which would amount to grave misconduct. Therefore, the said Rule cannot be applicable for the conviction for the offence regarding the commercial transaction. In such view of the matter, the Authorities cannot withhold or stop the pension on the strength of Rules 8(b) of the Pension Rules. Hence, we do not find any merit in the appeal.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.A(MD)No. 250 of 2026 and C.M.P.(MD) No.2721 of 2026 1. The Director,...

[17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2033763822817972675 [17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: SupremeCourt constitution bench to start hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa. [17/03, 10:12] Meta AI: SC constitution bench will revisit the Bangalore Water Supply test for “industry” in Rajappa case.

[17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2033763822817972675 [17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: SupremeCourt constitution bench to start hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa. [17/03, 10:12] Meta AI: SC constitution bench will revisit the Bangalore Water Supply test for “industry” in Rajappa case.

[17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2033763822817972675 [17/03, 10:12] sekarreporter1: SupremeCourt constitution bench to start hearing on the correctness of the definition of “industry” given by then Justice VR Krishna Iyer in the 1978 decision in Bangalore...

கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோயிலுக்கு செலுத்த வேண்டிய ஒன்பது கோடி வாடகை பாக்கிய செலுத்த இந்து அறநிலையத்துறை உத்தரவிட்டது எதிர்த்து தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி

கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோயிலுக்கு செலுத்த வேண்டிய ஒன்பது கோடி வாடகை பாக்கிய செலுத்த இந்து அறநிலையத்துறை உத்தரவிட்டது எதிர்த்து தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி

[17/03, 10:08] sekarreporter1: கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோயிலுக்கு செலுத்த வேண்டிய ஒன்பது கோடி வாடகை பாக்கிய செலுத்த இந்து அறநிலையத்துறை உத்தரவிட்டது எதிர்த்து தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கு தள்ளுபடி வலி நிவாரணிக்கு பெயர் பெற்ற அம்ருதாஞ்சன் நிறுவனம் சென்னை மயிலாப்பூர் கபாலீஸ்வரர் கோவிலுக்கு சொந்தமான லஸ் சர்ச் சாலையில்...

Judge kumarappan /dearness allowances in family pension based on the G.O.No.112, Finance (Pension) department dated 24.03.2008 issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu. I state that above said G.O. relied by the petitioner would applicable only to the family pensioners of government department. I state that the petitioner is also receiving family pension along with dearness allowance from the Government for the service render by her husband in the transport department.”

2026:MHC:836 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 05-02-2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 27 – 02- 2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 36589 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015 1. Tmt.P.Vanajakshi...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com