Follow:
- Next story sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/mHXPHjFH8-Y?si=kJNNhcY4dJNQy68J [29/04, 13:32] sekarreporter1: [29/04, 13:31] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/mHXPHjFH8-Y?si=HKJWhlkU114YIDeh [29/04, 13:31] sekarreporter1: 29/04/2026 To The Hon’ble Smt. Droupadi Murmu, President of India, President’s Secretariat, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 004. Sub: Enrolment of former Prime Minister Shri. Rajiv Gandhi’s assassin as an advocate by Bar Council of TN and Puducherry. Respected Sir, I pen this letter to your good selves not with ink, but with the blood and rage of every right-thinking lawyer and a conscientious person from every corner of this nation. I am a lawyer practising for 26 years now in the Madras High Court, and had the distinction of having held several elected positions, including the Vice-President, in the Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA). As I am a sitting MP in the Lok Sabha, I am conscious of the responsibilities of a lawmaker. I am, therefore, writing this to address a gap or vacuum in law relating to enrolment of people convicted for serious offences including acts of terrorism. April 27, 2026 shall go down in the judicial history of our great nation as a Black Day, as the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry enrolled A.G. Perarivalan is the convicted assassin of former Prime Minister Shri. Rajiv Gandhi, as an advocate on its rolls. Perarivalan is an active member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which is an internationally banned terrorist organisation. The ban is continuing in India as well
- Previous story Crl.O.P.No.10161 of 2026 Crl.O.P.No.10161 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.7240 of 2026 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.1571 of 2025, currently pending on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Puducherry, was filed against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 153B, 295A, 298 and 504 of IPC, without obtaining
Recent Posts
- 41.This judgment is a precedent for the proposition that when the language of the document is clear, plain and unambiguous, the Court must give effect to its literal
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station
More
Recent Posts
- 41.This judgment is a precedent for the proposition that when the language of the document is clear, plain and unambiguous, the Court must give effect to its literal
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station