Monthly Archive: February 2026

Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section  200 CRPC [26/02, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) BC 592 : Nihali devi vs state

Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section 200 CRPC [26/02, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) BC 592 : Nihali devi vs state

[26/02, 13:19] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) crimes 134 SC : Ahmad Ali quraishi vs state of Uttar pradesh : Rejection.of application under section.156(3) CRPC does not preclude a complainant to file a complaint under section...

since they have failed to comply with the direction issued by this Court within the stipulated time of twelve weeks, and directs them to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- each to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to state that in future, if any direction is issued or any order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN CONT P No.3706 of 2025 C.Sathish Son of R.Chandrasekaran No.18, First Street, Amman...

#NCRET #SupremeCourt #DinakaranNews  நீதித்துறையில் ஊழல் என்ற கட்டுரை மூலம் நீதித்துறை மீது துப்பாக்கியால் சுட்டுள்ளனர்; ரத்தம் கொட்டுகிறது : உச்சநீதிமன்றம்  dinakaran.com/news/supreme-c…

#NCRET #SupremeCourt #DinakaranNews நீதித்துறையில் ஊழல் என்ற கட்டுரை மூலம் நீதித்துறை மீது துப்பாக்கியால் சுட்டுள்ளனர்; ரத்தம் கொட்டுகிறது : உச்சநீதிமன்றம் dinakaran.com/news/supreme-c…

#NCRET #SupremeCourt #DinakaranNews நீதித்துறையில் ஊழல் என்ற கட்டுரை மூலம் நீதித்துறை மீது துப்பாக்கியால் சுட்டுள்ளனர்; ரத்தம் கொட்டுகிறது : உச்சநீதிமன்றம் dinakaran.com/news/supreme-c…

[26/02, 11:49] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz Counsel for Respondents: Mr. David Sundar Singh Standing Counsel, Mr. K. M. D. Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. K.C. Karl Marx Case Title: C. Ve. Shanmugam v. The Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women and Others Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 92 [26/02, 11:49] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court Quashes Case Against Rajya Sabha MP C Shanmugam For Alleged Derogatory Comments Against Women https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-state-women-commission-case-c-ve-shanmugam-quashed-524626

[26/02, 11:49] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz Counsel for Respondents: Mr. David Sundar Singh Standing Counsel, Mr. K. M. D. Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. K.C. Karl Marx Case Title: C....

A mention is made on behalf of AIADMK MP I.S. Inbadurai before #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan that the DVAC hasn’t registered a First Information Report #FIR so far regarding the alleged cash for jobs scam in Minister K.N. Nehru’s Municipal Administration and Water Supply department. The Chief Justice says, the court will look into the issue if an appropriate petition is filed. So, the MP is expected to file a contempt of court petition

[26/02, 11:43] sekarreporter1: A mention is made on behalf of AIADMK MP I.S. Inbadurai before #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan that the DVAC hasn’t registered a First Information...

[26/02, 11:16] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan will hear in the afternoon a writ petition filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK challenging two provisions of a Standard Operating Procedure formulated by Tamil Nadu government to regulate events in which more than 5,000 people participate. Hearing passed over at the request of the petitioner party which wanted some time for the appearance of a senior counsel. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 [26/02, 11:16] sekarreporter1: .

[26/02, 11:16] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan will hear in the afternoon a writ petition filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK challenging two provisions of a Standard Operating Procedure formulated by Tamil Nadu government to regulate events in which more than 5,000 people participate. Hearing passed over at the request of the petitioner party which wanted some time for the appearance of a senior counsel. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 [26/02, 11:16] sekarreporter1: .

[26/02, 11:16] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan will hear in the afternoon a writ petition filed by Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK challenging two provisions of a Standard...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com