SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: February 23, 2026

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court recently held that generating Tatkal tickets for out-of-turn passengers without collecting fare would be misconduct under the Railway Service Conduct Rules. The court thus found an employee guilty of issuing tickets to third parties and violating the norms for issuing tickets. The bench of Justice CV Karthikeyan and Justice K Kumaresh Babu observed that the…”

[“The Madras High Court recently held that generating Tatkal tickets for out-of-turn passengers without collecting fare would be misconduct under the Railway Service Conduct Rules. The court thus found an employee guilty of issuing...

[23/02, 19:26] sekarreporter1: Ok [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2025932329097797796 [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: Dear MHAA members the last date for payment of subscription arrears has been extended to 27/2/2026 those members who have paid the amount kindly ignore this message.. Regards A.Vignesh Adv Contesting for senior EC in upcoming MHAA election

Uncategorized

[23/02, 19:26] sekarreporter1: Ok [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2025932329097797796 [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: Dear MHAA members the last date for payment of subscription arrears has been extended to 27/2/2026 those members who have paid the amount kindly ignore this message.. Regards A.Vignesh Adv Contesting for senior EC in upcoming MHAA election

[23/02, 19:26] sekarreporter1: Ok [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2025932329097797796 [23/02, 19:28] sekarreporter1: Dear MHAA members the last date for payment of subscription arrears has been extended to 27/2/2026 those members who have...

Vinothpandian: Madras High court : CRP no 3840 of 2025 dated 18th Feb 2026 Dr jaishith jebakumar manuel vs R srinath : civil suits challenging proceedings under the SARFAESI act are not maintainable in view of section 34 of the SARFAESI act , which

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: Madras High court : CRP no 3840 of 2025 dated 18th Feb 2026 Dr jaishith jebakumar manuel vs R srinath : civil suits challenging proceedings under the SARFAESI act are not maintainable in view of section 34 of the SARFAESI act , which

[23/02, 16:00] Vinothpandian: Madras High court : CRP no 3840 of 2025 dated 18th Feb 2026 Dr jaishith jebakumar manuel vs R srinath : civil suits challenging proceedings under the SARFAESI act are not...

Uncategorized

Madras High Court, via Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, entertained the appeal by the petitioner with a delay of 150 days beyond the condonable period subject to the payment of an additional 10% of the disputed tax amount to the respondents.

[23/02, 19:31] sekarreporter1: Top Home »Top Stories »Madras HC Condones… Madras HC Condones 150-Day Delay, Directs Additional 10% Disputed GST Before Appeal is Heard [Read Order] The Madras High Court took note of the petitioner’s...

Uncategorized

Admk புகழேந்தி: *இரட்டை இலை சம்பந்தமாக ஒருங்கிணைப்பு குழுவைச் சேர்ந்த வா புகழேந்தி தொடுத்திருந்த வழக்கில் தேர்தல் ஆணையம் விரைந்து நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க டெல்லி உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மீண்டும் கண்டனத்தோடு உத்தரவு,*

[23/02, 12:42] Admk புகழேந்தி: *இரட்டை இலை சம்பந்தமாக ஒருங்கிணைப்பு குழுவைச் சேர்ந்த வா புகழேந்தி தொடுத்திருந்த வழக்கில் தேர்தல் ஆணையம் விரைந்து நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க டெல்லி உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மீண்டும் கண்டனத்தோடு உத்தரவு,* இரட்டை இலை சம்பந்தமாக ஒருங்கிணைப்பு குழுவைச் சேர்ந்த வா புகழேந்தி தொடுத்திருந்த...

Uncategorized

[23/02, 18:49] sekarreporter1: Inbadurai, ADMK MP has filed a caveat in SC urging the apex court not to pass any ex-parte orders if KN Nehru appeals against the Madras HC judgement directing registration of FIR on the information shared by ED. [23/02, 18:49] sekarreporter1

[23/02, 18:49] sekarreporter1: Inbadurai, ADMK MP has filed a caveat in SC urging the apex court not to pass any ex-parte orders if KN Nehru appeals against the Madras HC judgement directing registration of...

Uncategorized

In the present case, if we look into the contents of the impugned notice, it is apparent that it is not in the nature of show cause, but a premeditated decision and cannot be treated as show cause notice by any stretch of imagination. 16. Therefore, viewed from any angle, the impugned notice cannot be sustained in law and the same is set aside.

2026:MHC:699 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.4792 of 2026 R.Jaya W/o.Raj No.5, Solaiamman...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com