Daily Archive: December 31, 2025

Justices SM Subramaniam and P Dhanabal directed the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, State Transport Commissioner, and other respondents to file their counter affidavit within four weeks and adjourned further hearing”

Justices SM Subramaniam and P Dhanabal directed the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, State Transport Commissioner, and other respondents to file their counter affidavit within four weeks and adjourned further hearing”

[31/12, 09:00] Sekarreporter: “Justices SM Subramaniam and P Dhanabal directed the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, State Transport Commissioner, and other respondents to file their counter affidavit within four weeks and adjourned...

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, speaking for the Court in M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. v. I.T. Expressway Ltd. & Ors., held that the arbitral award was based on a reasonable and contractually sustainable interpretation of the terms and did not”

[31/12, 08:34] Sekarreporter: “Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, speaking for the Court in M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. v. I.T. Expressway Ltd. & Ors., held that the arbitral award was based on a reasonable and contractually...

The court also noted that once an offence is compounded, it cannot be used to deny statutory rights like FCRA registration. The Ministry has been instructed to re-evaluate its rejection within three months.

The court also noted that once an offence is compounded, it cannot be used to deny statutory rights like FCRA registration. The Ministry has been instructed to re-evaluate its rejection within three months.

[31/12, 08:31] Sekarreporter: https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/charitable-status-recognised-us-12a-cannot-cease-under-fcra-madras-hc-sets-aside-rejection-orders-reconsideration-1441114 [31/12, 08:31] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that charitable status recognised under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act cannot cease under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act...

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy held that an invention using algorithms and computer programs that results in a technical contribution is not excluded from patentability under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. The court emphasized that for an invention to be patentable, it must involve technical considerations and be achieved by technical means, such as using hardware like processors and search engines. The decision was made in the context of a patent application for a system and method for matching database records based on similarities to search queries. ¹ ² ³

[31/12, 08:29] Sekarreporter: https://www.mondaq.com/india/patent/1725242/technical-considerations-achieved-by-technical-means-implemented-on-a-computer-patentable-madras-high-court-rules [31/12, 08:29] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that technical considerations achieved by technical means implemented on a computer are patentable. In a recent case, Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy...

justices GK Ilanthiraiyan and R Poornima said so while dismissing a Habeas Corpus Petition (HCP) filed by a woman seeking a direction to quash the detention order passed by Thanjavur collector against her 38-year-old brother under ‘sexual offender’ category on April 17.”

justices GK Ilanthiraiyan and R Poornima said so while dismissing a Habeas Corpus Petition (HCP) filed by a woman seeking a direction to quash the detention order passed by Thanjavur collector against her 38-year-old brother under ‘sexual offender’ category on April 17.”

[31/12, 08:25] Sekarreporter: “justices GK Ilanthiraiyan and R Poornima said so while dismissing a Habeas Corpus Petition (HCP) filed by a woman seeking a direction to quash the detention order passed by Thanjavur collector...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com