SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: December 29, 2025

Uncategorized

Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to do “complete justice” by quashing the FIR, conviction and sentence against the appellant.

The Supreme Court has quashed the rape conviction and sentence of a man accused of sexually exploiting a woman on the false promise of marriage, after the parties married each other during the pendency...

Uncategorized

Supreme Court has questioned the propriety of an In-charge Judge passing orders on merits in a rent matter when the regular judge was on leave, without issuing notice to the affected party. Observing that such a course of action is “prima facie not tenable”, the Court emphasised

Supreme Court has questioned the propriety of an In-charge Judge passing orders on merits in a rent matter when the regular judge was on leave, without issuing notice to the affected party. Observing that...

Justice S Srimathy gave the direction on an anticipatory bail petition filed by six trustees — Thannermalai, Muthuraman, Alagu Narayanan, Arunachalam, Swaminathan, and Balamurugan. According to the prosecution, the six were booked by the district crime branch,

Uncategorized

Justice S Srimathy gave the direction on an anticipatory bail petition filed by six trustees — Thannermalai, Muthuraman, Alagu Narayanan, Arunachalam, Swaminathan, and Balamurugan. According to the prosecution, the six were booked by the district crime branch,

Madurai Bench of Madras HC Madurai Bench of Madras HC MADURAI: The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court recently appointed a commission under a retired HC judge to probe into the alleged swindling...

Concluding the 86-page judgment, Justice Dr. R.N. Manjula delivered a categorical ruling, noting that: “This Court is constrained to hold that the entire process followed by the first respondent is in gross violation of the earlier orders passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench… The very registration of the FIR and filing of chargesheet are vitiated by jurisdictional error, legal bar, and procedural impropriety.”

Uncategorized

Concluding the 86-page judgment, Justice Dr. R.N. Manjula delivered a categorical ruling, noting that: “This Court is constrained to hold that the entire process followed by the first respondent is in gross violation of the earlier orders passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench… The very registration of the FIR and filing of chargesheet are vitiated by jurisdictional error, legal bar, and procedural impropriety.”

Home News HIGH COURTS MADRAS CBI Cannot Override Court’s Authority: No FIR or Chargesheet Without Compliance with Section 195 CrPC: Madras High Court Quashes FIR Against Idol Wing’s Former IG A.G. Ponmanickavel 28 December...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com