SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: December 3, 2025

Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused the plea to extend the deadline for uploading Waqf property details on the UMEED Portal, reaffirming that 5 December 2025 remains the final date. As Minister of Minority Affairs, I have received several requests from Waqf Boards and stakeholders seeking an extension. For any grievance or issue related to Waqf properties, the UMEED Act provides a clear remedial mechanism, stakeholders may approach the Waqf Tribunal as prescribed under the law. The Ministry remains committed to transparency, accountability, and strengthening Waqf management across the country.

Uncategorized

Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused the plea to extend the deadline for uploading Waqf property details on the UMEED Portal, reaffirming that 5 December 2025 remains the final date. As Minister of Minority Affairs, I have received several requests from Waqf Boards and stakeholders seeking an extension. For any grievance or issue related to Waqf properties, the UMEED Act provides a clear remedial mechanism, stakeholders may approach the Waqf Tribunal as prescribed under the law. The Ministry remains committed to transparency, accountability, and strengthening Waqf management across the country.

[03/12, 10:16] Sekarreporter: Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused the plea to extend the deadline for uploading Waqf property details on the UMEED Portal, reaffirming that 5 December 2025 remains the final date. As Minister...

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Mythri Movie Makers: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – Respondents: M/s. Jidesh Kumar, Navod Prasannan, Vijay R Sekar, Akalya Ravichandran, G. Lakshmi Prathista Reddy, RV. Che Guvera, Dhakshin Kumar – *Court Observation:* The case is listed for pronouncing orders.

*Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified –...

National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.

Uncategorized

National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.

[03/12, 09:55] Sekarreporter: 22 WP/41380/2025 (PIL) J.BREZHNEV VS UNION MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND 7 OTHERS. M/S. S.TAMIL SELVAN R.S. SELVAM P. PRAVEEN SAMADHANAM S. PRASATH —————— M/S.DR.G.BABU, CG SR PC FOR R1 MEMO DT.06/11/2025...

Uncategorized

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond within 3 weeks to a petition seeking a special investigation team probe into an alleged attempt to steal a gold lizard idol from the Kancheepuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple.

*Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent:...

Uncategorized

Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)* – *Judge:* Justice K. Kumaresh Babu – *Parties:* [Not specified in the news report] ( likely the family of the deceased vs. Tangedco) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed Tangedco to pay ₹20 lakh as compensation to the family of a man who was electrocuted while working on an electric pole installation without proper authorization. The court noted that a Tangedco foreman had engaged the deceased without permission, and the foreman was subsequently suspended and punished

[03/12, 08:19] Sekarreporter: [03/12, 08:19] Sekarreporter: Home News Cities Madurai HC directs Tangedco to pay compensation to kin of man who was electrocuted after unauthorisedly engaged for work Published – December 02, 2025 08:14...

Uncategorized

Head notes Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N. Senthilkumar – *Parties:* Nannir Water Source LLP (Petitioner) vs. YouTube LLC and Syed Imran and Syed Abbas (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not specified – For Respondents: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed YouTube LLC to block a video review of a water energiser on the ‘Buying Facts’ channel, stating that YouTubers cannot damage a company’s reputation under the guise of reviewing products. An interim injunction was also granted, restraining the channel from circulating the review.

*Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N. Senthilkumar – *Parties:* Nannir Water Source LLP (Petitioner) vs. YouTube LLC and Syed Imran and Syed Abbas (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:*...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com