SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: December 3, 2025

Official Services In Devaraja Swamy Temple, Kancheepuram Shall Be Performed By Thengalai Members Only: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/pb-rajahamsam-v-s-narayana-2025-mhc-2741-kancheepuram-temple-thengalai-members-1599934 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

Uncategorized

Official Services In Devaraja Swamy Temple, Kancheepuram Shall Be Performed By Thengalai Members Only: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/pb-rajahamsam-v-s-narayana-2025-mhc-2741-kancheepuram-temple-thengalai-members-1599934 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

Official Services In Devaraja Swamy Temple, Kancheepuram Shall Be Performed By Thengalai Members Only: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court/pb-rajahamsam-v-s-narayana-2025-mhc-2741-kancheepuram-temple-thengalai-members-1599934 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court &...

Uncategorized

Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025 – *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025 – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.

[03/12, 16:32] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant:...

Pallikaranai

Uncategorized

Pallikaranai

பள்ளிக்கரணை சதுப்பு நிலத்தை செயற்கைக் கோள் உதவியுடன் துல்லியமாக அளவிடும் பணிகள் 99 சதவீதம் முடிவடைந்து விட்டதாக தமிழக அரசு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. சென்னை பள்ளிக்கரணை சதுப்பு நிலத்தில் பன்னடுக்கு குடியிருப்பு வளாகம் கட்ட அனுமதி அளித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்யக் கோரியும், பள்ளிக்கரணை சதுப்பு...

Uncategorized

TN Government Returns Madras High Court Collegium Recommendations — First in Indian Judiciary In an unprecedented move in Indian judicial history, the Government of Tamil Nadu has returned the Madras High Court Collegium’s recommendations for the elevation of six District Judges to the High Court.

TN Government Returns Madras High Court Collegium Recommendations — First in Indian Judiciary In an unprecedented move in Indian judicial history, the Government of Tamil Nadu has returned the Madras High Court Collegium’s recommendations...

Uncategorized

: *Chennai, 03 December 2025* The writ petition W.P. No. 47451 of 2025, filed by Haji T. S. Ahmed Ibrahim, was listed today for admission before the Hon’ble Justice P. B. Balaji in Court Hall C-42. In this petition, the petitioner challenges G.O.(Ms) No. 97 dated 28.11.2025, issued by the Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (T1) Department, relating to the nomination and appointment of Waqf Board members. The petitioner contends that two non-Muslim members were not appointed, as mandated under the second proviso to Section 14 of the UUWMEED Act, 1995. He therefore seeks a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the said Government Order on the grounds that it is illegal, arbitrary, and without authority of law. He further prays for a direction to the State Government to constitute the Waqf Board strictly in accordance with Section 14 of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995 (as amended by Act 14 of 2025) and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order dated 15.09.2025 in *Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025* (W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025). Appearances: * Mr. V. Meenakshi Sundaram, for Mr. Vashik Ali, appearing for the petitioner. * Mr. P. S. Raman, Learned Advocate General and Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Fazil, Government Advocate, for the State Government. * Mr. V. Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Avinash, for the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. The Hon’ble Court has adjourned the matter to 09 December 2025 for filing of counter affidavits and for further hearing. [03/12, 11:24] Sekarreporter: 👍

[03/12, 11:24] Sekarreporter: *Chennai, 03 December 2025* The writ petition W.P. No. 47451 of 2025, filed by Haji T. S. Ahmed Ibrahim, was listed today for admission before the Hon’ble Justice P. B. Balaji...

Uncategorized

This Court cannot sit on appeal against such a finding rendered by the sole Arbitrator. 35. In the upshot, this Court does not find any perversity or patent illegality in the award passed by the sole Arbitrator and none of the grounds provided under Section 34 of the Act has been satisfied by the petitioner. Hence, the present petition lacks merit and the same is hereby dismissed with costs of Rs.1,50,000/- payable by the petitioner to the respondent. 28-11-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ss N.ANAND VENKATESH J. ss Order in Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 34 of 2021 28-11-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 25-11-2025 DATE OF DECISION : 28-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 34 of 2021 M/s.Mediaone Global Entertainment...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com