Daily Archive: November 9, 2025

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta has made a shocking revelation in the landmark judgement of the Ram temple land dispute case. He said in a book launch event that attempts were made to ensure that an effective hearing of the land dispute does not happen in the Supreme Court. He also added

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta has made a shocking revelation in the landmark judgement of the Ram temple land dispute case. He said in a book launch event that attempts were made to ensure that an effective hearing of the land dispute does not happen in the Supreme Court. He also added

[09/11, 10:55] Sekarreporter: [09/11, 10:55] Sekarreporter: Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta has made a shocking revelation in the landmark judgement of the Ram temple land dispute case. He said in a book launch...

Justices Anita Sumanth and C. Kumarappan was hearing a petition filed by B. Rajesh of Chennai. The petitioner complained that there were no proper arrangements and basic amenities such as drinking water, proper seating arrangements and medical assistance at the temple. The devotees were subjected to untold hardship, he said.

Justices Anita Sumanth and C. Kumarappan was hearing a petition filed by B. Rajesh of Chennai. The petitioner complained that there were no proper arrangements and basic amenities such as drinking water, proper seating arrangements and medical assistance at the temple. The devotees were subjected to untold hardship, he said.

News Cities Madurai Plea to issue guidelines to regulate darshan at Tiruchendur temple The petitioner had submitted a detailed representation to the authorities and suggested measures to streamline darshan management at the temple; The...

As a result, the Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 stands dismissed.  The judgment and decree passed by the Learned III Additional District Judge,  Salem in O.S.No.102 of 2004 is confirmed.   There shall be no orders to costs.  Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.  04.07.2025 Index	:Yes. Neutral citation	:Yes/No. bsm To, 1. The  III Additional District Judge, Salem. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.  Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. bsm Pre-delivery judgment made in A.S.No.180 of 2022 04.07.2025

As a result, the Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 stands dismissed. The judgment and decree passed by the Learned III Additional District Judge, Salem in O.S.No.102 of 2004 is confirmed. There shall be no orders to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 04.07.2025 Index :Yes. Neutral citation :Yes/No. bsm To, 1. The III Additional District Judge, Salem. 2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. bsm Pre-delivery judgment made in A.S.No.180 of 2022 04.07.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 20.06.2025 Pronounced on: 04.07.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022 1. Alamelu, Widow of...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com