Follow:
Recent Posts
- CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable as against the dismissal of an application seeking leave to defend in a summary suit. The parties need not be relegated to file an appeal. This proposition holds good even if a decree has already been passed in the summary suit. The Court arrived at this conclusion by relying upon the judgment in Shivsu Canadian Clear
- 08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoQDxXLEVS-ZnR4HYwS8vylYkS9CRTc3U?si=mLRj06CRrh4qVty- [08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
More
Recent Posts
- CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable as against the dismissal of an application seeking leave to defend in a summary suit. The parties need not be relegated to file an appeal. This proposition holds good even if a decree has already been passed in the summary suit. The Court arrived at this conclusion by relying upon the judgment in Shivsu Canadian Clear
- 08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoQDxXLEVS-ZnR4HYwS8vylYkS9CRTc3U?si=mLRj06CRrh4qVty- [08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court