Monthly Archive: August 2025

[11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ1J-s4P3uViv-aBleLUCwF296jZdPGG_?si=t6Od9xGEUh9I4Ia9 [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Tvk flag copy right case for tvk senior adv vijayanarayanan going to argue for gowtham adv [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Against tvk adv ganabathy

[11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ1J-s4P3uViv-aBleLUCwF296jZdPGG_?si=t6Od9xGEUh9I4Ia9 [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Tvk flag copy right case for tvk senior adv vijayanarayanan going to argue for gowtham adv [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Against tvk adv ganabathy

[11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxQ1J-s4P3uViv-aBleLUCwF296jZdPGG_?si=t6Od9xGEUh9I4Ia9 [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Tvk flag copy right case for tvk senior adv vijayanarayanan going to argue for gowtham adv [11/08, 12:14] Sekarreporter: Against tvk adv ganabathy

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs BSNL, MTNL, Tata Communications, Airtel, Vodafone & a host of other Internet Service Providers to block pirated versions of Rajinikanth starrer #Coolie on “rogue websites

Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs BSNL, MTNL, Tata Communications, Airtel, Vodafone & a host of other Internet Service Providers to block pirated versions of Rajinikanth starrer #Coolie on “rogue websites

[11/08, 12:09] Sekarreporter: Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy of #MadrasHighCourt directs BSNL, MTNL, Tata Communications, Airtel, Vodafone & a host of other Internet Service Providers to block pirated versions of Rajinikanth starrer #Coolie on “rogue websites...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
கூலி திரைப்படம் இணையதளங்களில் வெளியிட  சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தடை…

கூலி திரைப்படம் இணையதளங்களில் வெளியிட சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தடை…

[11/08, 11:57] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxlyEKUAMLevye5kucXMIt_3PURf-uSCbp?si=Q8JJNi4WYEOf3LSC [11/08, 11:57] Sekarreporter: [11/08, 11:53] Sekarreporter: ΟΑ/805/2025 Interim injunction M/S SUN TV NETWORK LTD VS BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED M/S.KING AND PARTRIDGE JOSE JOHN M. NARENDRAN AND C.S (COMM DIV)...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice K. Kumaresh Babu after analyzing arguments directed to earlier rulings on similar provisions under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules and GST Rules. It concluded that under Section 169(1)(a) to (c) the modes are alternative but obligatory, and failure to follow these necessitates resorting to the following

Justice K. Kumaresh Babu after analyzing arguments directed to earlier rulings on similar provisions under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules and GST Rules. It concluded that under Section 169(1)(a) to (c) the modes are alternative but obligatory, and failure to follow these necessitates resorting to the following

×s Madras HC: Email Notice or Personal Delivery of GST Order Mandatory Before Publication on Portal or Newspaper The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court held that the personal delivery or e-mail notice of the Goods...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice K. Kumaresh Babu granted the interim injunction after 59 members of MTCOPU filed a joint civil suit complaining that the DMK and its affiliated body Labour Progressive Federation (LPF) had appointed the office-bearers at will without conducting elections.

Justice K. Kumaresh Babu granted the interim injunction after 59 members of MTCOPU filed a joint civil suit complaining that the DMK and its affiliated body Labour Progressive Federation (LPF) had appointed the office-bearers at will without conducting elections.

Madras High Court restrains functioning of office-bearers appointed by DMK to MTC trade union without conducting elections Justice K. Kumaresh Babu grants the interim injunction pursuant to a civil suit filed by 59 members...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
“If the government is not able to spare a sum of Rs 25,42,21,775 for additional infrastructure to the high court in the state, it reflects the poor state of affairs prevailing in the state,” a bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan remarked.

“If the government is not able to spare a sum of Rs 25,42,21,775 for additional infrastructure to the high court in the state, it reflects the poor state of affairs prevailing in the state,” a bench of Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan remarked.

“Follow Us MADURAI: Expressing displeasure at the state government’s delay in releasing funds to the tune of Rs 25.4 crore towards acquisition of 9.5 acres of temple land in front of the court campus,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version