SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: August 2025

C V E SHANMUGAM B A B L AND 3 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER —————— AND WMP 30663/2025 Interim injunction C.V E.SHANMUGAM B.A., B.L., VS THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AND 3 OTHERS. M/S. K.GOWTHAMKUMAR E. BALAMURUGAN N.S. AMOGH SIMHA P. MANOJKUMAR A.P. BALAJI VIJITH A.N. SAUGHANTHIKA A.S —————— AND WMP 33330/2025 Direction J.H.INIYAN VS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND 2 OTHERS. M.GANESHAN Y.T. ARAVIND GOSH L.RAMKUMAR V.JAIHARISUDHAN S.K.KANNADASAN —————— AND WP 26829/2025 (PIL) J.H.INIYAN VS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND 2 OTHERS. M.GANESHAN Y.T. ARAVIND GOSH L.RAMKUMAR V.JAIHARISUDHAN S.K.KANNADASAN —————— M/S.A.ARUNBABU FOR R2 DT.05/08/2025 AND WP 27277/2025 (PIL) C.V E.SHANMUGAM B.A., B.L., VS THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AND 3 OTHERS. M/S. K.GOWTHAMKUMAR E. BALAMURUGAN N.S. AMOGH SIMHA P. MANOJKUMAR A.P. BALAJI VIJITH A.N. SAUGHANTHIKA A.S —————— M/S.RICHARDSON WILSON FOR R4 DT.01/08/2025 12 TO VACATE THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20/10/2023 IN WMP.30568 OF

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 14, 2025

C V E SHANMUGAM B A B L AND 3 OTHERS. STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER —————— AND WMP 30663/2025 Interim injunction C.V E.SHANMUGAM B.A., B.L., VS THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AND 3 OTHERS. M/S. K.GOWTHAMKUMAR E. BALAMURUGAN N.S. AMOGH SIMHA P. MANOJKUMAR A.P. BALAJI VIJITH A.N. SAUGHANTHIKA A.S —————— AND WMP 33330/2025 Direction J.H.INIYAN VS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND 2 OTHERS. M.GANESHAN Y.T. ARAVIND GOSH L.RAMKUMAR V.JAIHARISUDHAN S.K.KANNADASAN —————— AND WP 26829/2025 (PIL) J.H.INIYAN VS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND 2 OTHERS. M.GANESHAN Y.T. ARAVIND GOSH L.RAMKUMAR V.JAIHARISUDHAN S.K.KANNADASAN —————— M/S.A.ARUNBABU FOR R2 DT.05/08/2025 AND WP 27277/2025 (PIL) C.V E.SHANMUGAM B.A., B.L., VS THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, AND 3 OTHERS. M/S. K.GOWTHAMKUMAR E. BALAMURUGAN N.S. AMOGH SIMHA P. MANOJKUMAR A.P. BALAJI VIJITH A.N. SAUGHANTHIKA A.S —————— M/S.RICHARDSON WILSON FOR R4 DT.01/08/2025 12 TO VACATE THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20/10/2023 IN WMP.30568 OF

[14/08, 08:19] Sekarreporter: Cj bench item 11 cv s [14/08, 08:19] Sekarreporter: 11 to modify the order dated 31.07.2025 passed in W.M.P.NO.30663 of 2025 in W.P.NO.27277 of 2025 IN To modify the order WMP/32933/2025...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Armstrong accused Nagenthiran

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Armstrong accused Nagenthiran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W. P.(Crl.) No.267 of 2025and W.M.P.(Crl.) No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi …Petitioner vs. 1.State...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Spilit verdict MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 & 24387 of 2025and W.M.P.Nos.27436, 27439, 27456 & 27458 of 2025 W.P.No.24381 of 2025: M.Gunasekaran … Petitioner -vs

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

Spilit verdict MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 & 24387 of 2025and W.M.P.Nos.27436, 27439, 27456 & 27458 of 2025 W.P.No.24381 of 2025: M.Gunasekaran … Petitioner -vs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 07.07.2025 Pronounced on : 31.07.2025 C O R A M: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W. P.Nos.24381 &...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion. https://www.sekarreporter.com/split-verdict-on-whether-the-community-status-of-a-government-employee-can-be-verified-scrutinised-after-their-retirement-while-justice-nisha-banu-opined-that-reopening-the-verification-of-a-communi/

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion. https://www.sekarreporter.com/split-verdict-on-whether-the-community-status-of-a-government-employee-can-be-verified-scrutinised-after-their-retirement-while-justice-nisha-banu-opined-that-reopening-the-verification-of-a-communi/

[13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxE_nobkhqi-YZZxn-FYjBjKBm-p-PVeg1?si=fHO3-d8GyMMqmLbu [13/08, 20:33] Sekarreporter: split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of a community certificate would amount to re-litigation, Justice N Jothiraman opined that once a verification starts, it should continue till its conclusion.

The Madras High Court has delivered a split verdict on whether the community status of a government employee can be verified/scrutinised after their retirement. While Justice Nisha Banu opined that reopening the verification of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police, by holding that the commission does not have such powers to issue arrest warrant and further held that the commission

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 13, 2025

Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police, by holding that the commission does not have such powers to issue arrest warrant and further held that the commission

[13/08, 19:35] Sekarreporter: The Hon’ble Madras High Court upon hearing the matter today, quashed the warrant of arrest issued by the commission for schedule caste and schedule tribe as against the superintendent of police,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version