SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: August 2025

Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan that a G.O. was passed on August 11 granting administrative and financial sanction for Rs 25.4 crore towards land acquisition. Further steps are being taken and the award would be finalised by September 20, he added.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 15, 2025

Justices G Jayachandran and KK Ramakrishnan that a G.O. was passed on August 11 granting administrative and financial sanction for Rs 25.4 crore towards land acquisition. Further steps are being taken and the award would be finalised by September 20, he added.

TN releases Rs 25.4 crore for expansion of HC campus in Madurai Criticising the government for being “insensitive” to the need of the judiciary, the bench last week summoned the chief secretary if the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice MS Ramesh and Justice V Lakshminarayanan passed the interim orders in a habeas corpus petition against the detention of lawyers and law students who joined the protest yesterday.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 15, 2025

Justice MS Ramesh and Justice V Lakshminarayanan passed the interim orders in a habeas corpus petition against the detention of lawyers and law students who joined the protest yesterday.

[15/08, 07:08] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-lawyer-law-students-detained-sanitation-workers-protest-300961 [15/08, 07:08] Sekarreporter: The Madras High Court on Thursday (August 14) directed the release of four lawyers and two law students who were detained by the police at midnight in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Chennai Corporation Commissioner, the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, and the Chennai District Collector to ban

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 14, 2025

Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan was hearing a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Chennai Corporation Commissioner, the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary, and the Chennai District Collector to ban

The Madras High Court, on Thursday, orally remarked that shelter homes should be established to protect stray dogs, in addition to sterilizing and vaccinating them. The court has also asked the State government to...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
I am in complete agreement with the above order passed by Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Pugalendhi. The term “Vaishnavite” has a larger connotation and it should never be identified with reference to a particular community. As rightly held, all those, who worship Lord Perumal are Vaishavites and there cannot be any discrimination based on community. Therefore, the insistence of the petitioner that only a Hindu Vaishnavite Brahmin should be permitted to participate in the auction virtually tantamounts to perpetuating caste system, which does not auger well for a true vaishnavite. As has been observed supra, there is going to be no compromise to the ritual practices/agamas and also the experience in preparing prasadham in vaishnavite temple earlier for five years. If that is ensured, it does not really matter as to whether the participant belongs to a brahmin community. 13. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the relevant clause contained in the auction notice and the respondent can proceed further with the auction and finalize the same in favour of the highest bidder. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.08.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes Index: Yes Speaking Order gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm To The Executive Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukovil, Little Kancheepuram. Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 12.08.2025

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 14, 2025

I am in complete agreement with the above order passed by Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.Pugalendhi. The term “Vaishnavite” has a larger connotation and it should never be identified with reference to a particular community. As rightly held, all those, who worship Lord Perumal are Vaishavites and there cannot be any discrimination based on community. Therefore, the insistence of the petitioner that only a Hindu Vaishnavite Brahmin should be permitted to participate in the auction virtually tantamounts to perpetuating caste system, which does not auger well for a true vaishnavite. As has been observed supra, there is going to be no compromise to the ritual practices/agamas and also the experience in preparing prasadham in vaishnavite temple earlier for five years. If that is ensured, it does not really matter as to whether the participant belongs to a brahmin community. 13. In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the relevant clause contained in the auction notice and the respondent can proceed further with the auction and finalize the same in favour of the highest bidder. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 12.08.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes Index: Yes Speaking Order gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm To The Executive Officer/Assistant Commissioner, Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukovil, Little Kancheepuram. Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 12.08.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.30409 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.34091 and 34094 of 2025 L.Ravi S/o.Lakshminarashiman Petitioner Vs The Executive Officer/...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made. However, this Court reiterates that the preappointment procedures, as contemplated by the Honourable

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 14, 2025

We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of DGP is yet to be made. However, this Court reiterates that the preappointment procedures, as contemplated by the Honourable

[14/08, 19:20] Sekarreporter: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxgm582CdSQM9AEQsVX8EeHQ6juOte6OXu?si=xbScNGBGCie9rive [14/08, 19:54] Sekarreporter: “We concur with the said view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench at the Principal Seat in view of the fact that the appointment to the post of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
12.Accordingly, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the detenues, namely K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, Mohan Babu, R.Raj Kumar, Muthuselvan and Valarmathi, on condition that the petitioner herein or the aforesaid 6 persons shall not give any press interviews or statements or post anything in the social medias with regard to the issue in hand, till the next date of hearing. 13.Call the matter on 21.08.2025. (M.S.RAMESH,J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.) 14-08-2025 hvk Note: Issue order copy on 14.08.2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, G2, Periyamedu Police Station, Chennai-600 003. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 14, 2025

12.Accordingly, the respondents are directed to forthwith release the detenues, namely K.Bharathi, K.Suresh, Mohan Babu, R.Raj Kumar, Muthuselvan and Valarmathi, on condition that the petitioner herein or the aforesaid 6 persons shall not give any press interviews or statements or post anything in the social medias with regard to the issue in hand, till the next date of hearing. 13.Call the matter on 21.08.2025. (M.S.RAMESH,J.) (V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.) 14-08-2025 hvk Note: Issue order copy on 14.08.2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, No.132, Commissioner Office, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007. 2.The Inspector of Police, G2, Periyamedu Police Station, Chennai-600 003. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

HCP.No.1599 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-08-2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN HCP.No.1599 of 2025 S.Vijay No.268, New Additional Law Chambers, 1st Floor...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version