SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: August 25, 2025

நெல்லையப்பர் கோவிலில் அனுமதிக்கப்பட்ட கடைகள் தொடர்பாக HRCE துறையை கண்டித்த உயர்நீதிமன்றம் – இணை ஆணையருக்கு நேரில் வருமாறு உத்தரவு

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

நெல்லையப்பர் கோவிலில் அனுமதிக்கப்பட்ட கடைகள் தொடர்பாக HRCE துறையை கண்டித்த உயர்நீதிமன்றம் – இணை ஆணையருக்கு நேரில் வருமாறு உத்தரவு

நெல்லையப்பர் கோவிலில் அனுமதிக்கப்பட்ட கடைகள் தொடர்பாக HRCE துறையை கண்டித்த உயர்நீதிமன்றம் – இணை ஆணையருக்கு நேரில் வருமாறு உத்தரவு 25.06.2025 அன்று, மாண்புமிகு நீதியரசர் S.M. சுப்ரமணியம் மற்றும் நீதியரசர் அருள்முருகன் ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய அமர்வில் மதுரை கிளை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தின் முதல் பெஞ்ச், நெல்லையப்பர்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Among the signatories are former Supreme Court judges Justices A.K. Patnaik, Abhay Oka, Gopala Gowda, Vikramjit Sen, Kurien Joseph, Madan Lokur, and J. Chelameswar. Former Chief Justices of High Courts including Govind Mathur, S. Muralidhar, and Sanjib Banerjee, as well as several retired High Court judges such as Anjana Prakash, C. Praveen Kumar, A. Gopal Reddy, G. Raghuram, K. Kannan, K. Chandru, B. Chandrakumar, and Kailash Gambhir, have also endorsed

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Among the signatories are former Supreme Court judges Justices A.K. Patnaik, Abhay Oka, Gopala Gowda, Vikramjit Sen, Kurien Joseph, Madan Lokur, and J. Chelameswar. Former Chief Justices of High Courts including Govind Mathur, S. Muralidhar, and Sanjib Banerjee, as well as several retired High Court judges such as Anjana Prakash, C. Praveen Kumar, A. Gopal Reddy, G. Raghuram, K. Kannan, K. Chandru, B. Chandrakumar, and Kailash Gambhir, have also endorsed

[25/08, 10:32] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/ex-judges-condemn-amit-shahs-remarks-misinterpreting-supreme-courts-salwa-judum-judgment-301826 [25/08, 10:33] Sekarreporter: Among the signatories are former Supreme Court judges Justices A.K. Patnaik, Abhay Oka, Gopala Gowda, Vikramjit Sen, Kurien Joseph, Madan Lokur, and J. Chelameswar. Former Chief Justices...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
justices S M Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan said authorities concerned are bound to follow the above guidelines, and added that quarry operations must be transparent and free of irregularities, especially in

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

justices S M Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan said authorities concerned are bound to follow the above guidelines, and added that quarry operations must be transparent and free of irregularities, especially in

‘Strictly follow guidelines on quarrying, sale of sand’: Madurai Bench of Madras HC However, the government counsel told the court that the guidelines are being properly followed by the officials and that they are...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was chaired by former Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, along with Madras High Court Judges C.V. Karthikeyan and C. Kumarappan in Erode on Saturday.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was chaired by former Chief Justice of India P. Sathasivam, along with Madras High Court Judges C.V. Karthikeyan and C. Kumarappan in Erode on Saturday.

Former CJI P. Sathasivam chairs meeting on improving timely justice delivery in Erode Published – August 24, 2025 08:29 pm IST – Erode The Hindu Bureau A consultation on improving timely justice delivery was...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that the petitioner had filed his return on time and disclosed the foreign income, which was duly accepted by the department. The court explained that the only objection was delay in filing Form 67, which could not by itself defeat the substantive claim for FTC.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Justice Krishnan Ramasamy observed that the petitioner had filed his return on time and disclosed the foreign income, which was duly accepted by the department. The court explained that the only objection was delay in filing Form 67, which could not by itself defeat the substantive claim for FTC.

” Home »Top Stories »Filing Form 67 Before… Filing Form 67 Before Final Income Assessment is Sufficient Compliance: Madras HC Rules Rule 128 Directory, Not Mandatory [Read Order] The Madras High Court ruled that filing...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Therefore, I am not inclined to admit this writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to pay amounts that may be to stave off any immediate proposal for re-auctioning the property and attempt to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PJL To 1. The Reserve Bank of India, Department of Banking Regulation, 13th Floor, Central Office Building, Mumbai – 400 001. 2. The General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 3. The Assistant General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 4. The Branch Head, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802. 5. Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802.   C.SARAVANAN , J. PJL W .P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 13.08.2025

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 25, 2025

Therefore, I am not inclined to admit this writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to pay amounts that may be to stave off any immediate proposal for re-auctioning the property and attempt to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 13.08.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No PJL To 1. The Reserve Bank of India, Department of Banking Regulation, 13th Floor, Central Office Building, Mumbai – 400 001. 2. The General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 3. The Assistant General Manager, Credit Audit Monetary Department, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Head Office, 1st Floor, No. 57, V.E. Road, Thoothukudi 628 002. 4. The Branch Head, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802. 5. Authorised Officer, Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Limited, Thalakkulam Branch, Monday Market, Kaniyakumari – 629 802.   C.SARAVANAN , J. PJL W .P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 13.08.2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD)No.22136 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17213 & 17214 of 2025 M/s. Kirubha Exports, Represented by its Proprietrix Mrs.V.T. Kirubha,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version