SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: August 16, 2025

Justices MM Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal heard the case concerning the fixation of tariffs by the Appellant-Paradip Port Authority (formerly Paradip Port Trust) for the use of port facilities by the Respondent-M/s. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. The

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 16, 2025

Justices MM Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal heard the case concerning the fixation of tariffs by the Appellant-Paradip Port Authority (formerly Paradip Port Trust) for the use of port facilities by the Respondent-M/s. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. The

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (Aug. 12) recommended the formation of an expert committee to hear appeals against orders of the Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP), constituted under the Major Ports Trusts Act,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice A D Maria Clete observed that the report of the surveyor clearly stated that the petitioner encroached upon highways land and put up unauthorised construction, which was

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 16, 2025

bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice A D Maria Clete observed that the report of the surveyor clearly stated that the petitioner encroached upon highways land and put up unauthorised construction, which was

Read ePaper News Madurai TOI Games Live Videos Real Estate World India Business Tech TOI Newsletters Cricket Sports Entertainment TV Voice Of Conscience Web Series Life & Style Education Speaking Tree Trending Thane FireRahul...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice C. Saravanan directed that, within this time limit, the petitioner must upload a reply along with the documents earlier not furnished, which had led to the adverse assessment. After the compliance, the assessing officer was directed to pass a

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 16, 2025

Justice C. Saravanan directed that, within this time limit, the petitioner must upload a reply along with the documents earlier not furnished, which had led to the adverse assessment. After the compliance, the assessing officer was directed to pass a

Non-Submission of… Non-Submission of Documents Led to Best Judgment Assessment: Madras HC Quashes Income Tax Order subject to 15% Deposit [Read Order] The court, noting the petitioner’s willingness to now submit the required documents,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
நீதிபதிகள் என்.சதீஷ்குமார், டி.பரதசக்கரவர்த்தி சிறப்பு அமர்வு விசாரித்துவருகிறது.இந்த நிலையில் கோவை மாவட்டத்தில் யானை வழித்தடம் தொடர்பான பொதுநல வழக்கை விசாரித்த சிறப்பு அமர்வு முன்பு கோவை எட்டிமடையில் உள்ள

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 16, 2025

நீதிபதிகள் என்.சதீஷ்குமார், டி.பரதசக்கரவர்த்தி சிறப்பு அமர்வு விசாரித்துவருகிறது.இந்த நிலையில் கோவை மாவட்டத்தில் யானை வழித்தடம் தொடர்பான பொதுநல வழக்கை விசாரித்த சிறப்பு அமர்வு முன்பு கோவை எட்டிமடையில் உள்ள

[16/08, 07:26] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/ApeWyXwrkpk?si=T0cBPa99gmqu1kXG [16/08, 07:26] Sekarreporter: யானை வழித்தடத்தில் மின்சார கம்பி வேலி அமைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது தொடர்பான புகார் குறித்து கோவையில் உள்ள மாதா அமிர்தானந்தமாயி விஸ்வ வித்யாபீட நிகர்நிலை பல்கலைக்கழக வளாகத்தை ஆய்வு செய்து அறிக்கை சமர்பிக்கும்படி கோவை மாவட்ட வன அலுவர் தலைமையிலான...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh directed the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases to submit the report by August 22, 2025. He also directed S. Vimala, serving as the Superintendent of Police in the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), to file an affidavit explaining the substantial delay in obtaining sanction to prosecute the public servants listed as accused in the case.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 16, 2025

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh directed the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases to submit the report by August 22, 2025. He also directed S. Vimala, serving as the Superintendent of Police in the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), to file an affidavit explaining the substantial delay in obtaining sanction to prosecute the public servants listed as accused in the case.

₹98.25-crore Corporation contract irregularities during S.P. Velumani’s tenure: Madras HC questions special court over delay in taking chargesheets on file Justice N. Anand Venkatesh also directs DVAC SP S. Vimala to file an affidavit...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version