SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: July 27, 2025

I make it clear that I was not consulted nor have I sent any such “written confirmation” authorizing Mr. Justice K. Chandru to issue the said letter. 1, therefore, dissociate myself from the contents of the said letter. Justice K.K Sasidharan Former Judge, High Court, Madras CamScanner

Uncategorized

I make it clear that I was not consulted nor have I sent any such “written confirmation” authorizing Mr. Justice K. Chandru to issue the said letter. 1, therefore, dissociate myself from the contents of the said letter. Justice K.K Sasidharan Former Judge, High Court, Madras CamScanner

[27/07, 08:00] Sekarreporter: [27/07, 07:57] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1949284736955822227?t=gaw7MD25Axh6OOmvxPR7rg&s=08 [27/07, 07:59] Sekarreporter: Justice K.K. Sasidharan Former Judge High Court, Madras 1-A, VRUDHI 867, Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010 26.07.2025 My attention has been...

Resultantly, the Appeal Suit is partly allowed and the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court is modified in the following terms: (i)         The plaintiff is entitled to 8/49 share in the Suit Properties and a Preliminary Decree is passed to that extent; (ii)       The defendants 2 to 6 and 8 are restrained from alienating / encumbering the Suit Properties so as to cause prejudice to the plaintiff’s 8/49 share in it, until complete partition is effected; (iii)     The Suit is dismissed qua seventh defendant. 27. Considering the relationship between the parties, there shall be no order as to costs.       23.07.2025 Index         : Yes Speaking Order                    : Yes Neutral Citation                    : Yes  TK To   The III Additional District Judge Salem.  R. SAKTHIVEL, J.   TK APPEAL SUIT NO.204 OF 2017 23.07.2025

Uncategorized

Resultantly, the Appeal Suit is partly allowed and the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court is modified in the following terms: (i)         The plaintiff is entitled to 8/49 share in the Suit Properties and a Preliminary Decree is passed to that extent; (ii)       The defendants 2 to 6 and 8 are restrained from alienating / encumbering the Suit Properties so as to cause prejudice to the plaintiff’s 8/49 share in it, until complete partition is effected; (iii)     The Suit is dismissed qua seventh defendant. 27. Considering the relationship between the parties, there shall be no order as to costs.       23.07.2025 Index         : Yes Speaking Order                    : Yes Neutral Citation                    : Yes  TK To   The III Additional District Judge Salem.  R. SAKTHIVEL, J.   TK APPEAL SUIT NO.204 OF 2017 23.07.2025

2025:MHC:1776 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL APPEAL SUIT NO.204 OF 2017 Raju Gounder (Died) 1.Kuppuswamy 2.Dhanapal 3.Indira 4.Selvaraju 5.Prema 6.The Sub...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com