SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: January 14, 2023

16.As seen from the above, the Supreme Court also dealt with Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and held that mere support to a banned organization will not by itself can become an offence. 9.That apart, when the petitioner claims that he requires eight hours to complete the programme, the condition that the programme should be conducted between 10 a.m. to 13.00 p.m. is also not proper and appropriate. Similarly, when the Police is going to cover the programme for legal scrutiny, they can also video-graph the event. They cannot require the petitioner to video-graph the entire programme and submit it to the petitioner. Therefore, aforesaid conditions namely condition Nos.1, 3 and 4 are set aside. Petitioner may be given eight hours time to conduct the programme from 10.00 a.m. on 23.12.2022. The respondent can make its own arrangement for videographing the oratory competition. It is made clear that the speech shall not be against the sovereignty of the nation, should not affect the sovereignty of the friendly relations of SAARC nations. Other conditions are upheld. 10.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.01.2023 ep Index   :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J., ep To 1.The Inspector of Police,    K-10, Koyembedu Police Station,    Chennai – 107. 2.The Public Prosecutor,     High Court of Madras. W.P. No.339 of 2023 10.01.2023

Uncategorized

16.As seen from the above, the Supreme Court also dealt with Section 10 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and held that mere support to a banned organization will not by itself can become an offence. 9.That apart, when the petitioner claims that he requires eight hours to complete the programme, the condition that the programme should be conducted between 10 a.m. to 13.00 p.m. is also not proper and appropriate. Similarly, when the Police is going to cover the programme for legal scrutiny, they can also video-graph the event. They cannot require the petitioner to video-graph the entire programme and submit it to the petitioner. Therefore, aforesaid conditions namely condition Nos.1, 3 and 4 are set aside. Petitioner may be given eight hours time to conduct the programme from 10.00 a.m. on 23.12.2022. The respondent can make its own arrangement for videographing the oratory competition. It is made clear that the speech shall not be against the sovereignty of the nation, should not affect the sovereignty of the friendly relations of SAARC nations. Other conditions are upheld. 10.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10.01.2023 ep Index   :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J., ep To 1.The Inspector of Police,    K-10, Koyembedu Police Station,    Chennai – 107. 2.The Public Prosecutor,     High Court of Madras. W.P. No.339 of 2023 10.01.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  10.01.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN W.P. No.339 of 2023 Pugazendhi Thangaraj         … Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai –...

Cock fight allowed THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Writ Petition No.305 of 2023.       For Petitioner           :  Mr.C.Munusamy                                  For Respondents       :  Mr.E.Vijay Anand    Additional Government Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.)

Uncategorized

Cock fight allowed THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Writ Petition No.305 of 2023.       For Petitioner           :  Mr.C.Munusamy                                  For Respondents       :  Mr.E.Vijay Anand    Additional Government Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:  06.01.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Writ Petition No.305 of 2023 C.Ganapathi                                          .. Petitioner   Vs. 1.The...

Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence [1/14, 11:17] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) CTC 889 : state bank of india vs V Ramakrishnan : IBC code 2016 section 2 (e) : applicable for persons termed as personal guarantor of a corporate debtor for limited purposes of sections 60(2) & 60 ( 3)

Uncategorized

Vinothpandian: 2012 (1) crimes 227 : Absar Alam @ Afsar Alam vs state of bihar : mental condition or state of mind of accused is one of factors that can be taken into account in considering question of sentence [1/14, 11:17] Vinothpandian: 2019 (1) CTC 889 : state bank of india vs V Ramakrishnan : IBC code 2016 section 2 (e) : applicable for persons termed as personal guarantor of a corporate debtor for limited purposes of sections 60(2) & 60 ( 3)

[1/13, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 1987 (2) RCR 199 : jagtar singh vs state of punjab : constitution of india article 161 : High court cannot direct the governor to decide the mercy petition within time...

5.Public money has been wasted due to adamant behaviour not only of the officer who terminated the services but also due to cantankerous attitude adopted by those responsible for pursuing the litigation before the one or the other authority. They have literally persecuted her. Despite unequal strength the opposite party has managed to survive. We are informed that the opposite party has been reinstated. This was put forward as bonafide conduct of petitioner to persuade us to modify the order in respect of back wages. Facts speak otherwise. Working life of opposite party has been lost in this tortuous and painful litigation of more than twenty years. For such thoughtless acts of its officers the petitioner-society has to suffer and pay an amount exceeding three lakhs is indeed pitiable. But considering the agony and suffering of the opposite party that amount cannot be a proper recompense. We, therefore, dismiss this petition as devoid of any merit and direct the petitioner to comply with the directions of the High Court within the time granted by it. We however leave it open to the society to replenish itself and recover the amount of back wages paid by it to the opposite party from the personal salary of the officers of the society who have been responsible for this endless litigation including the officer who was responsible for terminating the services of the opposite patty. We may clarify that the permission given, shall have nothing to do with the direction to pay the respondent her back wages. Step if any to recover the amount shall be taken only after payment is made to the opposite party as directed by the High Court…. ” No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.V.N., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)                                                                                                       12.01.2023 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ar                               S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ar PRE-DELIVERY JUDGMENT IN W.A.No.1692 of 2022   12.01.2023

Uncategorized

5.Public money has been wasted due to adamant behaviour not only of the officer who terminated the services but also due to cantankerous attitude adopted by those responsible for pursuing the litigation before the one or the other authority. They have literally persecuted her. Despite unequal strength the opposite party has managed to survive. We are informed that the opposite party has been reinstated. This was put forward as bonafide conduct of petitioner to persuade us to modify the order in respect of back wages. Facts speak otherwise. Working life of opposite party has been lost in this tortuous and painful litigation of more than twenty years. For such thoughtless acts of its officers the petitioner-society has to suffer and pay an amount exceeding three lakhs is indeed pitiable. But considering the agony and suffering of the opposite party that amount cannot be a proper recompense. We, therefore, dismiss this petition as devoid of any merit and direct the petitioner to comply with the directions of the High Court within the time granted by it. We however leave it open to the society to replenish itself and recover the amount of back wages paid by it to the opposite party from the personal salary of the officers of the society who have been responsible for this endless litigation including the officer who was responsible for terminating the services of the opposite patty. We may clarify that the permission given, shall have nothing to do with the direction to pay the respondent her back wages. Step if any to recover the amount shall be taken only after payment is made to the opposite party as directed by the High Court…. ” No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.V.N., J.)    (M.S.Q., J.)                                                                                                       12.01.2023 Speaking order/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ar                               S.VAIDYANATHAN, J. and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ar PRE-DELIVERY JUDGMENT IN W.A.No.1692 of 2022   12.01.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Reserved on Pronounced on 13.12.2022 12.01.2023   CORAM   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ   W.A.No.1692 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.11739...

Judge chandrasekar விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Judge chandrasekar விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவன் உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு எதிரான கொலை முயற்சி வழக்கின் விசாரணை நிலை குறித்த அறிக்கையை தாக்கல் செய்ய காவல் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. விடுதலை சிறுத்தைகள் கட்சி தலைவர் தொல்.திருமாவளவனை சந்திக்க கட்சி அலுவக்கத்திற்கு சென்ற தன்னை கட்சி அலுவலகத்தில்...

Judge anitha sumanth பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Judge anitha sumanth பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு தானமாக வழங்கப்பட்ட 220 ஏக்கர் சொத்துக்களை மீட்க எடுத்த நடவடிக்கை குறித்து விரிவான அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்யும்படி தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. பழனி தண்டாயுத பாணி கோவிலுக்கு, கோவை மாவட்டம், பொள்ளாச்சியைச் சேர்ந்த பலர் 220 ஏக்கர்...

R sureskumar judge நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

Uncategorized

R sureskumar judge நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது

  நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்புகளை சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் பதிவு செய்வது குறித்து சுற்றறிக்கை பிறப்பிக்க ஜனவரி 31ம் தேதி வரை தமிழ்நாடு அரசுக்கு கூடுதல் அவகாசம் வழங்கி சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. விழுப்புரம் மாவட்டம், திண்டிவனம் தாலுகாவில் உள்ள கீழ்புதுப்பட்டு கிராமத்தில் உள்ள 2.50 ஏக்கர்...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com