Daily Archive: April 29, 2021

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.20992 & 20993 of 2018—-For Petitioner : Mr.Srinath Sridevan [in both W.Ps] For Respondent in W.P.No.20992/2018 : Mr.N.Ramesh Standing counsel [For CMWSB]  in W.P.No.20993/2018 : M/s.Karthikaa Ashok Senior Standing counsel [For Chennai Corporation]—- Thus, the petitioner is not entitled to avail the benefit of property tax exemption under Section 101(e) of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act. Consequently, they are not entitled to get exemption from payment of water and sewerage Tax and charges.   case

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.20992 & 20993 of 2018—-For Petitioner : Mr.Srinath Sridevan [in both W.Ps] For Respondent in W.P.No.20992/2018 : Mr.N.Ramesh Standing counsel [For CMWSB] in W.P.No.20993/2018 : M/s.Karthikaa Ashok Senior Standing counsel [For Chennai Corporation]—- Thus, the petitioner is not entitled to avail the benefit of property tax exemption under Section 101(e) of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act. Consequently, they are not entitled to get exemption from payment of water and sewerage Tax and charges. case

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 26.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.20992 & 20993 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.24642 & 24643 of 2018 W.P.No.20992 of 2018 Sundaram Medical Foundation,...

While deciding the issue pertaining to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct prayer meetings in the subject premises, which was asserted by the petitioner to be a right which is inherent to Christianity and consequently a right guaranteed under the Constitution for practicing his religion, Hon’ble Justice N. Anand Venkatesh penning a judgment *dismissing the writ petition* on

While deciding the issue pertaining to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct prayer meetings in the subject premises, which was asserted by the petitioner to be a right which is inherent to Christianity and consequently a right guaranteed under the Constitution for practicing his religion, Hon’ble Justice N. Anand Venkatesh penning a judgment *dismissing the writ petition* on

[4/29, 20:01] Sekarreporter1: While deciding the issue pertaining to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct prayer meetings in the subject premises, which was asserted by the petitioner to be a right...

[4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/1vX1NC2cTlw [4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: What Centre Has Been Doing For Past 14 Months? Madras High Court Questions COVID Management Plan  https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-centre-has-been-doing-for-past-14-months-madras-high-court-questions-covid-management-plan-173323

[4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/1vX1NC2cTlw [4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: What Centre Has Been Doing For Past 14 Months? Madras High Court Questions COVID Management Plan https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-centre-has-been-doing-for-past-14-months-madras-high-court-questions-covid-management-plan-173323

[4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/1vX1NC2cTlw [4/29, 15:11] Sekarreporter1: What Centre Has Been Doing For Past 14 Months? Madras High Court Questions COVID Management Plan https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-centre-has-been-doing-for-past-14-months-madras-high-court-questions-covid-management-plan-173323

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH  W.P(MD)No.5226 of 2016  and  W.M.P.(MD).Nos.4683 of 2016 and 6124.   For Petitioner       :  Mr.J.Maria Roseline            For Respondents   :  Mr.Sricharan Rangarajan                                            Additional Advocate General                                            assisted by Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar                                            Special Government Pleader               ORDER            The issue involved in the present Writ Petition pertains to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct ——In view of the above discussion, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P(MD)No.5226 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.4683 of 2016 and 6124. For Petitioner       :  Mr.J.Maria Roseline           For Respondents   :  Mr.Sricharan Rangarajan                                           Additional Advocate General                                           assisted by Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar                                           Special Government Pleader             ORDER           The issue involved in the present Writ Petition pertains to the right claimed by the writ petitioner to conduct ——In view of the above discussion, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON       :  26.04.2021 PRONOUNCED ON :  29.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P(MD)No.5226 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.4683 of 2016 and 6124 of 2021  ...

TN AG says a complete lockdown may not be necessary on May 1 since it’s a public holiday on account of Labour Day. Says vaccination for those above 18 years begins on that day. However, there will be complete lockdown on May 2, he tells

TN AG says a complete lockdown may not be necessary on May 1 since it’s a public holiday on account of Labour Day. Says vaccination for those above 18 years begins on that day. However, there will be complete lockdown on May 2, he tells

[4/29, 13:32] Sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/ekSILwquBwM [4/29, 13:32] Sekarreporter1: TN AG says a complete lockdown may not be necessary on May 1 since it’s a public holiday on account of Labour Day. Says vaccination for those...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com