Daily Archive: February 13, 2021

13-2-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate:PART-I CONTINUES: (2) The introduction of Bill in either of parliament ( the introduction house is called as original house) after passed the Bill goes to another house..(3) the other house is second house, after passed by the second house,it will goes to president or if the second house made any

13-2-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate:PART-I CONTINUES: (2) The introduction of Bill in either of parliament ( the introduction house is called as original house) after passed the Bill goes to another house..(3) the other house is second house, after passed by the second house,it will goes to president or if the second house made any

13-2-21 mahaveer shivaji MHC advocate:PART-I CONTINUES: (2) The introduction of Bill in either of parliament ( the introduction house is called as original house) after passed the Bill goes to another house..(3) the other...

C.R.P.NPD.Nos.1633 and 2035 of 2020 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.25 of 2009 is the revision petitioner in C.R.P.No.1633 of 2020 and the plaintiff in the suit is the revision petitioner in C.R.P.No.2035 of 2020. I am not in agreement with the reasoning given by the learned Brother Justice Mr.R.Subramanian in the above cited decision as I find that the same is not inconsonance with the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 689 [cited supra], hence, taking note of the fact that important procedure that has to be followed as to whether in a partition suit, before passing of the final decree where an Advocate Commissioner has to be appointed to note down the physical features and to make assessment so as to enable the Court to pass the final decree or the matter has to be referred before the District Collector as per the wordings mentioned in Section 54 of CPC has to be considered by a Division Bench of this Court to settle the law as to the procedure to be followed in the partition suit by the subordinate Courts in this State.

ΦC.R.P.NPD.Nos.1633 and 2035 of 2020 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.   [ORDERS RESERVED ON : 01.12.2020] [ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON : 08.02.2021] The defendant in the suit in O.S.No.25 of 2009 is the revision petitioner in C.R.P.No.1633...

Day of Insurrection v. Days of Resurrection  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                      If Jan 6,2021 was the day of Constitutional nadir ,Feb 9-13, 2021 were the days  of Constitutional zenith. I am

Day of Insurrection v. Days of Resurrection  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                  If Jan 6,2021 was the day of Constitutional nadir ,Feb 9-13, 2021 were the days  of Constitutional zenith. I am

Day of Insurrection v. Days of Resurrection  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan   If Jan 6,2021 was the day of Constitutional nadir ,Feb 9-13, 2021 were the days  of Constitutional zenith. I am alluding to what transpired...

Appeal filed by mohnakrishnan in sc against salem bar case order IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. OF 2021 (Under Article 136 of the Constitution of India) (Against the Common final Impugned Judgment and Order dated 20/01/21 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition No 1571/2019) (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF) IN THE MATTER OF: G.MOHANAKRISHANAN Petitioner Versus V.MADHESH and others Respondents PAPER BOOK (FOR INDEX PLEASE SEE INSIDE) WITH I.A. No. of 2021: Application seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the Impugned Order WITH I.A. No. of 2021: Application permission to file SLP WITH I.A. No. of 2021: Application seeking exemption from filing official translation

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No. OF 2021 (Under Article 136 of the Constitution of India) (Against the Common final Impugned Judgment and Order dated 20/01/21...

Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) SCC ( cri ) 594 : state of NCT of delhi vs shiv charan bansal ; court while considering question of framing charges under section 227 of CRPC has power to sift and weigh evidence for limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case has been made out by the accused

Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) SCC ( cri ) 594 : state of NCT of delhi vs shiv charan bansal ; court while considering question of framing charges under section 227 of CRPC has power to sift and weigh evidence for limited purpose of finding out whether or not a prima facie case has been made out by the accused

[2/13, 10:01] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) SCC ( cri ) 594 : state of NCT of delhi vs shiv charan bansal ; court while considering question of framing charges under section 227 of CRPC has...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com