Daily Archive: October 6, 2020

While responding to the Rajya Sabha Member P.Wilson, Union Law Minister Mr. RS Prasad has stated that there were 398 Judges vacancies in the High Courts across the country, as of September1,2020.

Law Minister RS Prasad Denies Any Standoff Between Executive And Judiciary Despites Several Vacancies Across High Courts6th October 2020 6th October 2020 TaherAbedi 0 Comments FacebookTwitterWhatsAppShare (Judicial Quest News Network) While responding to the...

[10/6, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1313457851008905216?s=08 [10/6, 18:09] Sekarreporter 1: Today the Hon’ble Justice M.S. Ramesh heard applications for rejecting the election petition and striking off the paragraph of election petition filed by the O.P. Ravindranath. Who stated in those applications that election petition is not maintainable for taking trial hence the election petition to be rejected before trial. During March 2020 the Election Petitioner filed counter affidavit against the O.P. Ravindranath applications. Mr. Ravindranath took very long time and longer adjournments citing reason of corona. The Honorable judge gave time and ordered to argue the applications by O.P. Ravindranath Kumar today. Today the Honourable justice took up the application for hearing. On hearing both sides on applications of rejecting the plaint and strike off paragraphs of election petition. After hearing both sides argument,the Hon’ble Justice posted the matter on 16 .10. 2020 for pronouncing order on this applications. V.ARUN (Counsel for Election Petitioner) argued against OPR.

[10/6, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1313457851008905216?s=08 [10/6, 18:09] Sekarreporter 1: [10/6, 18:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1313457851008905216?s=08 [10/6, 18:09] Sekarreporter 1: Today the Hon’ble Justice M.S. Ramesh heard applications for rejecting the election petition and striking off...

Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy was appraised that the State is thereby treating any dealer holding a trademark from being ineligible to sell “unbranded” goods.–Can “unbranded” goods sold by a shop claiming Trademark be viewed as “branded” for tax purposes? Madras HC to decide

barandbench Madras High CourtMadras High Court Litigation News Can “unbranded” goods sold by a shop claiming Trademark be viewed as “branded” for tax purposes? Madras HC to decide By Meera Emmanuel 6th Oct, 2020...

Justice N. Sathish Kumar on Monday decided to commence, in the first week of November, the hearing of arguments on criminal revision petitions filed by the couple against a special court’s refusal to discharge them from the case on the ground that there were materials for trial.

TAMIL NADU I-T Dept. opposes Karti Chidambaram’s plea Karthi Chidambaram. File photo Karthi Chidambaram. File photo | Photo Credit: K. V. Srinivasan Legal Correspondent imran CHENNAI 06 OCTOBER 2020 01:05 IST UPDATED: 06 OCTOBER...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com