![K balu: நாளை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் 3 நீதிபதி அமர்வு முன்பாக டாஸ்மாக் வழக்கு விசாரணைக்கு வருகிறது [5/13, 19:56] Sekarreporter 1: [5/13, 19:50] K balu: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P N PRAKASH](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Sasikala paid 10 croes
- Previous story [11/18, 13:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/ThanthiTV/status/1328968389184909313?s=08 [11/18, 13:28] Sekarreporter 1: [11/18, 13:25] Sekarreporter 1: #Breaking || சிறையில் உள்ள சசிகலாவுக்காக வங்கி வரவோலை எடுத்தவர்களின் விவரம் * தந்தி தொலைக்காட்சி வெளியிடும் பிரத்யேக தகவல் * பாரத ஸ்டேட் வங்கியில் பழனிவேல் என்பவர் பெயரில் ரூ.3.25 கோடி வரவோலை #Sasikala https://t.co/SOZDjUHBo8 [11/18, 13:26] Sekarreporter 1: வசந்தா தேவி என்பவர் ரூ.3.75 கோடி டி.டி. எடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது * ஹேமா என்பவர் ஆக்சிஸ் வங்கியில் 3 கோடி ரூபாய்க்கு டி.டி. எடுத்து வழங்கியுள்ளார் * விவேக் பெயரிலும் ஆக்சிஸ் வங்கியில் ரூ.10,000-க்கு டி.டி. எடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது #Sasikala
Recent Posts
- In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS, 2023, is quashed as against the petitioners. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The interim stay already granted stands made absolute. 30.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml To 1. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
- Mmsj rskj pudukotai new court building mmsj excellent speech video
- Judge Victoria Gowri refused to quash because: prosecution has more than just co-accused statement, conscious possession is disputed fact for trial, prima facie case exists, and it doesn’t meet SC’s _Bhajan Lal_ criteria for quashing. So case must go to trial.
- Judge victoriya gowri This Court finds: (a) prosecution is not shown to rest solely on co-accused confession; (b) disputed questions of conscious possession arise; (c) prima facie materials exist requiring trial; (d) case does not fall within State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal20 categories.
- Madurai Bench* *Division Bench*: Justices N. Sathish Kumar & M. Jothiraman — *1. Specific Direction to 14 Collectors*
More
Recent Posts
- In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC, corresponding to Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) BNS, 2023, is quashed as against the petitioners. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. The interim stay already granted stands made absolute. 30.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Sml To 1. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Madurai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
- Mmsj rskj pudukotai new court building mmsj excellent speech video
- Judge Victoria Gowri refused to quash because: prosecution has more than just co-accused statement, conscious possession is disputed fact for trial, prima facie case exists, and it doesn’t meet SC’s _Bhajan Lal_ criteria for quashing. So case must go to trial.
- Judge victoriya gowri This Court finds: (a) prosecution is not shown to rest solely on co-accused confession; (b) disputed questions of conscious possession arise; (c) prima facie materials exist requiring trial; (d) case does not fall within State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal20 categories.
- Madurai Bench* *Division Bench*: Justices N. Sathish Kumar & M. Jothiraman — *1. Specific Direction to 14 Collectors*