Follow:
- Next story [10/05, 13:28] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxIFlt1pmBxLnDWIYZZYbhIb3TW1Nz_R6w?si=pg_673XLMzFC5a8t [10/05, 13:29] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: Advocate Tarun Rao appears for Election Commission of India. “What the petitioner seeks to do is to call in the question the election. This is permissible only by way of election petition.” [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: . [10/05, 13:27] sekarreporter1: Rao: Assembly constituency numbers, name and district are always published for east of postal form. [10/05, 13:28] sekarreporter1: Rao is now showing how a postal ballot form looks.
- Previous story [10/05, 12:51] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxWv2xqdg-qmbY8SDzO8uxrZkFURMfCr_J?si=xru4j01w8uEaeip0 [10/05, 12:56] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: How does a mandamus lie in this case? The interim prayers are far beyond the scope of the main writ petition. Are we issuing mandamus in abstract? [10/05, 12:57] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: Once a gentleman has been declared elected he has a right to perform duties under law. No injunction can be granted to a case where a duty is enjoined to be performed. Once he is elected, he is duty bound to be heard. They are intruding the right of public who had not voted [10/05, 12:57] sekarreporter1: Raghavachari: Is there an application filed by RO immediately on counting of votes? Court: Are there 2 constituencies by the same name? Raghavachari: Maybe. Court: You cannot say maybe. This is not a second. I am putting a straight question.
Recent Posts
- 41.This judgment is a precedent for the proposition that when the language of the document is clear, plain and unambiguous, the Court must give effect to its literal
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station
More
Recent Posts
- 41.This judgment is a precedent for the proposition that when the language of the document is clear, plain and unambiguous, the Court must give effect to its literal
- Madras high court quashes corruption case against security officer of late Tamil Nadu CM Karunanidhi
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.4633 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.3270 of 2026 C.Ganesan, S/o.Chokkalingam Pillai, Inspector of Police, SBCID Security (Core Cell), /Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in the impugned Final Report in CC No.13 of 2019 on the file of the Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Chennai in Crime No.4/AC/2012/CC-I on the file of the Additional Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and AntiCorruption, City Special Unit-I, Chennai-28 is quashed.
- Preponderance Of Probability Sufficient In Departmental Proceedings: Madras High Court Sets Aside Reinstatement Of Police Officer Found Drunk Inside Court Hall https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/2026-mhc-2846-director-general-of-police-v-v-arumuram-1618011 [19/07, 08:08] Meta AI: *Case #187: _Preponderance of Probability in Dept Proceedings_ | Madras HC* *Source: http://Verdictum.in* *Citation: 2026 MHC 2846* *Director General of Police v. V. Arumuram* *Service Law + Departmental Enquiry + Standard of Proof + Police Discipline*
- Judicial Magistrate, order quashed///HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.No.15309 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.No.9980 of 2026 Krishnamoorthy S/o.Subburaya Gounder … Petitioner vs. 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police Avinashipalayam Police Station