Follow:
- Next story Today CPC Suriyanarayanan
- Previous story Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948Article 226 in The Constitution Of India 1949Section 2 in The Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948The Kerala Unaided School … vs The State Of Kerala Represented By … on 3 March, 2008The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 v Parthiban j order
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
More
Recent Posts
- Tasmac சோதனை தொடர்பாக மேற்கொண்டு எந்த நடவடிக்கையும் எடுக்கவில்லை திங்கட்கிழமை (மார்ச் 24) வரை மேற்கொள்ள வேண்டாம் என அமலாக்கத் துறைக்கு ஐகோர்ட் வாய்மொழி அறிவுறுத்தல்
- MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN W.A.Nos. 567, 1458 and 1460 of 2024 and CMP Nos.3936, 10380 and 10389 of 2024 WA No.567 of 2024 S.Selvaraj
- MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.35158 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.38070 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.2306 of 2025 Kavitha Anand
- Justice S. Sounthar held, “Therefore, Section 21(g) of the ART Act creates a legal right for woman above the age of 21 years and below the age of 50 years to demand ART services as a matter of right, subject to conditions prescribed under Act…In other words, the woman outside the age bracket prescribed under the section, though may desire for ART services,
- Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held that the fundamental right of privacy included spousal privacy also and the contours of spousal privacy included a woman’s sexual autonomy. Highlighting that self pleasure was not a forbidden fruit
