Follow:
- Next story We are of the view that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove the vital circumstances, that is, last seen together, suspicious […] of the appellant captured in the video footage of the CCTV camera, the confessional disclosure statement, the FSL report […] which constituted the entire edifice of the prosecution case on which the conviction of the appellant was based. The impugned judgment is set aside. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant are hereby set aside. Appellant is acquitted. He shall be released from custody forthwith, if not wanted in any other case”, the Court ordered. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta delivered the verdict.
- Previous story Earlier this week, a lawyer tried to attack Chief Justice of India BR Gavai at the Supreme Court. Since then, the lawyer, advocate Rakesh Kishore, has been suspended from practicing law by the Bar Council of India.
Recent Posts
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍
- BREAKING Tamil Nadu’s Advocate General Vijay Narayan informs #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan that DVAC has registered a FIR today with respect to the cash for jobs complaint in the Municipal Administration and Water Supply department during K.N. Nehru’s tenure. Chief Justice wonders how can the FIR be registered when the previous Advocate General P.S. Raman had given an undertaking to the court, during the hearing of a contempt plea, that no coercive action will be taken till the next hearing. Mr. Narayan says, the undertaking given by his predecessor will not be binding upon him @THChennai Backgrounder👇
More
Recent Posts
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍
- BREAKING Tamil Nadu’s Advocate General Vijay Narayan informs #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan that DVAC has registered a FIR today with respect to the cash for jobs complaint in the Municipal Administration and Water Supply department during K.N. Nehru’s tenure. Chief Justice wonders how can the FIR be registered when the previous Advocate General P.S. Raman had given an undertaking to the court, during the hearing of a contempt plea, that no coercive action will be taken till the next hearing. Mr. Narayan says, the undertaking given by his predecessor will not be binding upon him @THChennai Backgrounder👇