Follow:
- Next story Judge senthil Kumar excellant speech
- Previous story நீதிபதி தண்டபானி அருமையான பேச்சு புதுக்கோட்டை விழா வீடியோவில்
Recent Posts
- Hare Krishna hare krishna
- Head notes cases mhc
- Madras High Court* – *Judges:* N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman – *Parties:* S.M. Vetrivel (Petitioner) vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of India & Ors. (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* November 25, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Mr. T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Deepika – For Respondents: Dr. G. Balu, Senior Panel Counsel for R2, R5, and R6; Mr. C.K. Chandrasekar for R4 – *Court Observation:* The court disposed of the petition, directing the Bar Council to take a decision as per law regarding reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in future elections. The court clarified that this direction should not come in the way of conducting the ongoing election. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the High Powered Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for exemption from payment of nomination fee.
- [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified (likely December 2, 2025) – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: M. Vijay Anand – For Respondent: Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu government to produce documents related to the tender process for conducting the 50th India Tourism and Industrial Fair at Chennai’s Island Grounds. The petitioner alleged that their bid was rejected on flaky grounds, despite their company having successfully conducted the event six times previously. The court adjourned the case to December 4, seeking further clarification on the tender process. [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/18 WP/47251/2025 (Gen. Misc.) M/S. FUN WORLD AND RESORTS INDIA PVT. LTD., VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND 4 OTHERS. M/S. M.VIJAY ANAND K.S.LEKHA SRI —————— Chennai
- head note: *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS* *WA No. 3250 of 2025* *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.* *Date of Order: 11-11-2025* *Coram:* – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar *Counsel:* – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4) *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.
More
Recent Posts
- Hare Krishna hare krishna
- Head notes cases mhc
- Madras High Court* – *Judges:* N. Sathish Kumar and M. Jothiraman – *Parties:* S.M. Vetrivel (Petitioner) vs. The Secretary, Bar Council of India & Ors. (Respondents) – *Date of Order:* November 25, 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Mr. T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Deepika – For Respondents: Dr. G. Balu, Senior Panel Counsel for R2, R5, and R6; Mr. C.K. Chandrasekar for R4 – *Court Observation:* The court disposed of the petition, directing the Bar Council to take a decision as per law regarding reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities in future elections. The court clarified that this direction should not come in the way of conducting the ongoing election. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the High Powered Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for exemption from payment of nomination fee.
- [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* M/s. Fnhn World Resorts India Private Limited (Petitioner) vs. The State of Tamil Nadu (Respondent) – *Date of Order:* Not specified (likely December 2, 2025) – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: M. Vijay Anand – For Respondent: Additional Advocate General J. Ravindran – *Court Observation:* The court directed the Tamil Nadu government to produce documents related to the tender process for conducting the 50th India Tourism and Industrial Fair at Chennai’s Island Grounds. The petitioner alleged that their bid was rejected on flaky grounds, despite their company having successfully conducted the event six times previously. The court adjourned the case to December 4, seeking further clarification on the tender process. [02/12, 14:25] Sekarreporter: 09/NSKJ/18 WP/47251/2025 (Gen. Misc.) M/S. FUN WORLD AND RESORTS INDIA PVT. LTD., VS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND 4 OTHERS. M/S. M.VIJAY ANAND K.S.LEKHA SRI —————— Chennai
- head note: *IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS* *WA No. 3250 of 2025* *V. Singaravelan vs. The Kattalai Thambiran & Ors.* *Date of Order: 11-11-2025* *Coram:* – Hon’ble Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hemant Chandangoudar *Counsel:* – For Appellant: Mr. M. Baskar for Mr. K. B. Vivekanandhan – For Respondents: Mr. Kandhan Duraisami (for R1), Mr. S. Ravee Kumar, Government Pleader (Puducherry) (for R3 and R4) *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court directed that only one assistant, instead of two, can assist the Kattalai Thambiran in the internal administration of the temple, considering his advanced age and physical inability to manage the affairs. The court also clarified that this arrangement will continue until further orders or till the final disposal of the writ appeal.