Follow:
- Next story W.P. (MD) No. 15931 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.08.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD).No.15931 of 2020 V.Ramesh … Petitioner Vs.
- Previous story Mhc advt vinothpandian 50 law tips Vinothpandian: 2007 (4) crimes 244 : sarav investment & FCPL : In a complaint under sec 138 NI act service of notice is a part of cause of action for lodging complaint
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Justice C Kumarappan observed that while the court has to exercise its discretion in a humane and compassionate manner, considering the past conduct, there was every possibility of delaying the trial.
- Author is a Senior Advocate at the Madras High Court and an International Energy Law Consultant. He advises Indian public sector undertakings and private entities on cross-border energy, critical minerals, and ECTA trade law, with offices in Chennai, New Delhi, and a FIFO venue in Sydney.
- Ed k n neru In these circumstances and taking into consideration the statement of the then Advocate General made at the Bar, we direct the State authorities not to undertake any further proceedings against any of the parties till the next date of hearing. 8. List these cases on 23.6.2026 as already directed on 28.4.2026. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 05.06.2026 sasi
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.1004 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1046 of 2026 1. Gnanasekaran 2. Shanmugasundharam 3. Sundaramoorthi … Petitioners/Accused Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thandikudi Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No. 157 of 2012. …. Respondent / Complainant 2. Paneerselvam ….. Respondent / Defacto Complainant
- [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoUcnEUKUAcNVuG0UxiOMPAoMye-4OYGH?si=jTcxTfFm8xzeOYXA [05/06, 15:01] sekarreporter1: [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: New office bearers of MTB have met the CJ [05/06, 14:59] sekarreporter1: 👍