![[27/01, 10:59] Sekarreporter: [27/01, 10:58] Sekarreporter: [27/01, 10:58] Sekarreporter: சவுக்கு சங்கர் வழக்கை அவசர வழக்காக விசாரிக்க ஐகோர்ட் pvj bench மறுப்பு savuku seek modification [27/01, 10:58] Sekarreporter: 🙏 [27/01, 10:58] Sekarreporter: Bench refused savuku urdent motion [27/01, 10:59] Sekarreporter: Add pp muniyapparaj for police](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story *Madras High Court* – *Case No.:* Not Available – *Judge:* N. Sathish Kumar – *Parties:* – Petitioner: Eros International Media Ltd – Respondent: 14 Reels Plus LLP (Akhanda 2 producers) – *Date of Order:* 3 December 2025 – *Counsel:* – For Petitioner: Not Available – For Respondent: Not Available – *Court Observation:* The Madras High Court has stayed the release of Akhanda 2, directing the producers, 14 Reels Plus LLP, not to release the film until they clear the arbitral dues of ₹28 crore owed to Eros International Media Ltd.
- Previous story [04/12, 13:39] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1996491924463874257?t=fnfxIp2ug5SO9xJs713ucw&s=08 [04/12, 13:39] Sekarreporter: Tamil Nadu Advocate General P.S. Raman reverts back to Justices MS Ramesh & R Sakthivel of #MadrasHighCourt to state that the Government had not mooted any via media solution, as claimed by Uzhaippor Urimai Iyakkam, to the conservancy workers dispute in Chennai @THChennai
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos,174 and 217 of 2026 Crl.O.P.(MD).Nos.16252, 16459, 16460, 16461, 16463, 16466, 16468, 16470, 16471, 16475, 16476, 16480, 16485, 18501, 18502, 18503, 18504, 18505, 18506 and 18507 of 2025 and Crl.R.C.(MD).Nos.1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1122, 1123, 1125, 1129, 1130, 1131 and 1132 of 2025, and Crl.M.P.Nos. 209, 210, 234 & 236 of 2026 and 11153, 11155, 11156, 11158, 11160, 11161, 11162, 11165, 11167, 11174, 11175, 11177, 13268, 13427, 13429, 13430, 13431, 13435, 13437, 13438, 13439, 13441, 13442, 13445, 13447, 13449, 15272, 15273, 15275, 15278, 15280, 15281, 15284 of 2025 CRL OP(MD) No.174 of 2026 1. M/s. PRP Exports, Represented by The Managing Partner Shri P. Palanisamy, Therkutheru Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai.
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road,
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.7419 of 2026 and CrlMP(MD)No.8017 of 2026 1.Jayaram Venkatesan 2.V.Suresh … Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch Crime Investigation Department (CBCID), No.220, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The Inspector of Police, Office of the Inspector of Police (CBCID), Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli – 627 007. 3.The State of Tamil Nadu rep by the Inspector of Police,
- Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 2191 – 2192 of 2025 dated 10th June 2026 ; The State of madya pradesh vs Ravi Shankar Singh ; High court cannot rewrite the criminal procedure code or introduce a new stage in the trial process through judicial directions , the directions issued by the High court under article 226 of the constitution of India , mandating trial court’s to
- W.P.No.21240 of 2026 — High Court of Judicature at Madras Case Reserved for Orders after Two-Hour Hearing Date: 24 June 2026 THE CASE AT A GLANCE The All India Private Educational Institutions Association (AIPEIA) had filed W.P.No.21240 of 2026 before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, challenging an order passed by the Tamil Nadu Information Commission (TNIC) and a consequential circular issued by the Director of Private Schools, which sought to compel all private schools across Tamil Nadu — including CBSE, ICSE, and Matriculation institutions — to publicly display their fee structures on notice boards, websites, and admission forms. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS