Follow:
- Next story Justice P Velmurugan and Justice M Jothiraman while hearing an application filed by the State police seeking to cancel the interim bail granted to YouTuber-journalist A Shankar @ Savukku Shankar.
- Previous story “You cannot blackmail the Bench too,” Justice P Velmurugan of #MadrasHighCourt tells Savukku Shankar while refusing to recuse from hearing a plea to cancel his bail though the YouTuber had accused the judge of bias. “I’ve never recused from hearing any case in my judicial career spanning over 20 years (including 11 years as a district judge & nine years as a High Court judge) and will not recuse from this case too,” the senior judge says. @THChennai
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NO. 5647 OF 2026 AND W.M.P. NOS. 6129 & 6132 OF 2026 SRICO Projects Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Mechineni Srinivasa Rao .. Petitioner – Vs – The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction) Southern Railway
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had
- https://x.com/i/status/2051594369271271840 [05/05, 15:20] sekarreporter1: ‘Parameters For Sections 156(3) & 200 CrPC Are Different’: Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Allowing Second 156(3) Plea |@mittal_mtn
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NO. 5647 OF 2026 AND W.M.P. NOS. 6129 & 6132 OF 2026 SRICO Projects Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Mechineni Srinivasa Rao .. Petitioner – Vs – The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction) Southern Railway
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had
- https://x.com/i/status/2051594369271271840 [05/05, 15:20] sekarreporter1: ‘Parameters For Sections 156(3) & 200 CrPC Are Different’: Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Allowing Second 156(3) Plea |@mittal_mtn