![[26/05, 19:20] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxj6cfREmxgdkpCXzGe6h3eXA_Nv_mJn9e?si=wIHg4OERip-buvyB [26/05, 19:21] sekarreporter1: [26/05, 19:16] sekarreporter1: Public Interest Litigation has been filed by P. Chockalingam, President of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, regarding the sexual assault and murder of a 10-year-old minor girl in the jurisdiction of Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore district. The petition requests the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under the supervision of the Madras High Court for a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation. [26/05, 19:18] sekarreporter1:](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.8649 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015. –For Petitioner : Mr.M.K.Bhoopathy For Respondents : Mr.C.Kathiravan Government Advocate [For R1 to R7] Mr.R.Ravichandran [For R8]
- Previous story நீதிபதிகள், இனிமேல் தமிழகத்தில் தனியார் எவரும் யானையை பிடித்து தங்கள் கட்டுப்பாட்டில் வைத்திருக்க கூடாது
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)
More
Recent Posts
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxAg7kpujWvtL21sksgS9DADuOI7cxFU0c?si=3B8lW4sX0GKhDmRc [18/06, 18:19] sekarreporter1: [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-judge-expected-to-engage-with-bar-not-sit-like-sphinx-538236 [18/06, 18:17] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently observed that the Indian Evidence Act enables a judge to ask any question that he pleases during trial with respect to any relevant or irrelevant fact during the trial. [2026 LiveLaw (Mad) 269] The bench of Justice GR Swaminathan and Justice R Poornima held
- National Investigation Agency #NIA appropriates ₹1.13 crore of fees paid by a Bihari woman medical student who had pursued MBBS course at a private college in Chennai. The agency takes the action after booking her brother and uncle under UAPA for having allegedly collected funds for banned maoist activities in Jharkhand. #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench rejects the student’s plea to direct the college to issue a course completion certificate to her. Judges say she cannot assert an equitable right to benefit from the proceeds of a crime.i
- [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxZv20Knss850Ix7rH8aaB_Y9Bquvj1ABy?si=9-o-8N9ytF4ECelb [18/06, 15:34] sekarreporter1: Judge should not sit like a sphinx, must engage with lawyers during hearings: Madras High Court | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/judge-should-not-sit-like-a-sphinx-must-engage-with-lawyers-during-hearings-madras-high-court
- https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-mbbs-student-fee-seized-nia-maoist-connection-no-relief-538177 [18/06, 13:10] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently refused to set aside an order of a single judge dismissing a student’s plea asking Chettinad Academy of Research and Education to grant her course
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.2422 of 2025 and CMP N os .18594 and 18595 of 2025 Puja Kumari, R/o. Village-Rustampur, P.O.- Hulasganj, P.S.-Ghoshi, District-Jahanabad, Bihar-804407, Currently residing at Sandhya Niwas, 69A Apartments, Nehru Nagar, Road, No.2, Patliputra, Patna, Bihar-800 013. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The President National Medical Commission, Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi – 110 077. 3. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Medical Council, 914, Poonamallee High Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 016. 4. The Director General National Investigation Agency, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003. 5. The Dean Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, OMR, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Chennai – 603 103. Respondent(s)